The Blue Comet (6.20)

AJ comes home from the hospital. 
Bobby’s life gets derailed. 
Tony holes up in a safehouse. 

Episode 85 – Originally aired June 3, 2007
Written by David Chase and Matthew Weiner
Directed by Alan Taylor


“The Blue Comet” was almost universally liked by fans and critics alike, and for good reason. It is an exciting episode, full of drama and pace. The hour is unique in that it could be seen as the first part of a two-parter, something that David Chase has never given us before. (Even though this hour does not end with a “To Be Continued” caption, the next episode picks up where this one ends.) I noticed a curious phenomenon when I was doing my research for this hour: several fans and reviewers misremembered events that occurred in this hour as happening in the next hour, and events that happened in the next hour as occurring in this hour. It’s almost as though “The Blue Comet” and “Made in America” together comprise the Series Finale in their minds. And perhaps they’re justified in thinking this way. In previous seasons, Chase and HBO would use Memorial Day weekend as a bye-week and then air the Season Finale the following Sunday. But in 2007, for this final season, they took Memorial Day weekend off (as usual) but then aired the final two episodes over the following two Sundays. In any case, regardless of whether you want to consider “The Blue Comet” to be part of the Series Finale or not, it is a powerful episode in its own right. Let’s get our teeth into it. 

The hour begins with the camera on Burt Gervasi’s white shoes. Many viewers were by now equating white shoes with death. I believe it was episode 6.14 “Stage 5” that first made this connection—the camera lingered on Johnny Sac’s white shoes just before he died—and the connection continues here. Silvio strangles Burt Gervasi with a wire. Gervasi was talking to New York about bringing in some new management to the New Jersey famiglia, and he pays the price for his betrayal. The garroting of Gervasi, we might note, is much more realistic and brutal than the garroting of Febby Petrulio in Season One’s “College.” (A possible reference to that hour now: Tony sees a telltale wound on Silvio’s hand and understands what went down with Burt, akin to how Meadow had seen a similar wound on her dad’s hand and suspected he was up to something in “College.”) The increased brutality between these two strangulations underlines the dark road The Sopranos has traveled in its depiction of violence, a result of David Chase’s ever-increasing commitment to realism and verisimilitude. Arrivaderci Burt, we hardly knew ya, so it’s hard for us to feel any great pain by your death. Burt’s killing may not feel very consequential to viewers but it may turn out to be a very consequential thing for Tony and the rest of the guys, as Burt was the cousin of Carlo Gervasi. In the next hour, Carlo is believed to be talking to the Feds, and perhaps the death of his cousin here helped push him to start cooperating. 

But Tony’s most pressing concern right now isn’t the Feds—it is Phil Leotardo. Phil, in probably his most quotable scene ever, gives the order to extinguish the rival family across the state line. When Phil gripes that he took Tony’s “fat fucking hand in friendship” at the hospital, it lends credence to the idea that his hatred of Tony comes at least in part from the fact that Tony saw him vulnerable and crying while he was recovering after his heart attack. We know that Phil is all about projecting a tough-guy machismo (maybe because he is trying to hide a closeted homosexuality, but more likely because he is just an old-school mobster). Tony saw Phil at a moment when his usual masculine posturing was down. Phil’s contempt for Tony now seems to be more about emotion and private vendetta and less about business. It’s become personal.

Agent Dwight Harris pays a visit to Satriale’s pork store. Tony sits with him for a moment, and the imagery expresses the complicated relationship between the two. They are cordial enough to share a table, but the vertical elements in the shot underscore the divisions between them:

end times

Although Harris is referring to the inclement weather when he muses, “End times, huh? Ready for the rapture,” we understand that his words may have a deeper significance. The words “end times” and “rapture” connect directly to the Christian eschatology (the theology concerned with the Final Days) that was evoked by the previous episode’s storyline and title. The sense of anguish and impending doom that colored “The Second Coming” is carrying over into the current episode.

This is the final time the that the viewer gets to see the interior of Satriale’s and so I get a little sentimental watching the scene, especially seeing that familiar ‘pig mural’ behind Tony. But there is no time to be sentimental now—things are moving fast. Agent Harris has caught wind of New York’s murderous plan and has come to warn Tony. On the sidewalk in front of the pork store, Harris delivers the news that Tony and his top leadership are possibly being targeted. Moments later, a claustrophobic shot hints that the walls are closing in on the New Jersey boss:

Tony blocking

Tony is so sickened by the agent’s words that he loses his appetite and tosses his sandwich into the trash can. I too was unhappy with the way the story was developing. As I’ve mentioned before, I felt there was something almost lazy about Chase’s decision to re-use Phil Leotardo and New York yet again to bring tension to the end of a season. But I suppose Chase’s decision makes more sense to me when I consider what the New York mob and the New Jersey mob might each represent. Many “conventional” movies and TV shows within the mob genre have used the New York mafia as their subject. The New Jersey mafia, on the other hand, has been the focus of Chase’s  more un-conventional show. The battle now between the New York and New Jersey mobs, then, might be read as a representation of the battle between conventional and unconventional methods of storytelling. (This metaphoric reading of what the New York and New Jersey mobs each represent is more justified when we listen to Phil’s rant early in this hour; he lists various reasons why “this pygmy thing over in Jersey” doesn’t fit the definition of a conventional, traditional Mafia family.) The Sopranos has continually crisscrossed the line, back-and-forth, between convention and innovation, and as it rushes toward its end now, we wonder: will David Chase close his series with the elements—warfare, death, prison—that we traditionally expect to find in this genre, or will he venture across the line into more unconventional territory? 

Tony meets with Sil and Bobby at Nuovo Vesuvio to discuss the impending war. Bobby is a true insider within the famiglia now, he has worked (and married) his way up the organization. Though Tony refers to him as “Buddha” when asking for his input, Bobby is more hawk-like than buddha-like: he wants to go to war. The intermezzo from the opera Cavalleria Rusticana plays at the restaurant, the same track that Martin Scorsese used as the theme for his film Raging Bull. Sil and T start throwing slow-motion punches at each other, a reference to the slow-motion boxing scenes in Scorsese’s movie. (Another point to make about Raging Bull is that one of its main antagonists was played by Frank Vincent, who of course plays antagonist “Phil Leotardo” on The Sopranos.) We watch with amusement as the guys trade fake-punches. Even with major conflict brewing, the guys are able to joke around and have fun, and it endears them to us.

David Chase also likes to have a little bit of fun as the heat turns up. He cuts from this scene at Vesuvio to a shop-sign with a funny pun built right into it:

flatbush bikini

Those unfamiliar with New York geography might think that “flatbush” is one of the waxing options offered by the shop, but Flatbush of course refers to a neighborhood in Brooklyn. Inside the shop (er, “shoppe”), Phil’s men make plans to hit 3 guys—Tony, Silvio and Bobby—within a 24-hour period. They have some doubt as to whether Bobby Bacala is the #3 man in the rival organization. Even we viewers might share their doubts. But the previous scene at the restaurant confirmed that it is indeed these three men helming the NJ mob now. New York has done its homework, and they are ready to bring the heat.

But New Jersey has a plan up its sleeve too: bring in the two Italian hitmen who killed Rusty Millio last year and surprise Phil at his goomar‘s house. The New Jersey mob is not as professional as their New York counterparts, as evidenced by their long chain of command; the order to carry out the plan passes from Bobby to Paulie to Patsy to Corky Caporale to the two Italians. (Butchie had earlier criticized New Jersey’s redundant layers of management.) Adding to the dysfunction, Paulie Walnuts seems to have some issues accepting orders directly from Bobby. New Jersey doesn’t seem to be in perfect fighting trim, but the apocalypse—ready or not—will soon be upon them.

The previous episode threatened apocalypse as well, but in that hour the potentially cataclysmic event was of a more domestic nature: Anthony Jr’s suicide attempt. AJ is still recovering in the psychiatric ward at Mountainside Hospital. His old acquaintance Rhiannon is also there, proving that possessing a beautiful mug and a lithe figure don’t exempt a person from having emotional and personal difficulties. (We first saw Rhiannon in episode 6.08 “Johnny Cakes.” She was at a nightclub pretending to be 20 when she was actually 15, and we later saw her giving AJ’s friend Hernan a blowjob.) In my previous write-up, I noted that the significance of Chase’s use of “Mountainside Hospital” could be that it connected to the “mountain” found in the lyrics of the old-timey song that closed the previous hour. An additional note about the real-world hospital can be made now: Mountainside is only one of two for-profit hospitals in the state of New Jersey. Indeed, Tony now complains about its hefty $2200 per day price-tag as he rides up its elevator. While Tony complains, Carmela screws on her smile and fixes her façade. Her son may have recently tried to sink himself into the dark abyss, but she manages to look as sharp as ever with her Mandarin jacket and perfect highlights and makeup:

Carm facade

(As the episode progresses, we’ll see more obvious examples of this sort of “façading” and masquerading.) Another note I want to make about this scene at the hospital is that the TV in the ward is showing an episode of the animated series Metalocalypse. The series is a comedy, but it is a very dark comedy and it can be bloody at times. The clip playing on the TV shows multiple dead bodies and severed limbs strewn about:


The cartoon’s name, “Metalocalypse,” may be giving us a premonition: the imminent apocalypse in SopranoWorld will be “metal” in nature, coming via guns and bullets. The bloodletting in SopranoWorld begins when the Italian hitmen arrive—and then whack the wrong guy. I guess there is some resemblance between Phil Leotardo and his goomar‘s father (though I wouldn’t say the man looks very much like the Shah of Iran), but the botched hit nevertheless points to how amateurish the north Jersey mob is compared to its adversary across the river. Maybe our guys are nothing more than “a glorified crew” after all. One of the most clever cuts of the episode—and of the entire series—takes place here, when Chase cuts from the unlucky civilian lying dead on the floor to a TV screen at the porn shop where Corky Caporale is hanging around:


Chase seems to be throwing a bone to his “hits-and-tits” viewers when he cuts from the hit to the tits. Tony is at home draining the swimming pool when Silvio arrives with the unsettling news that Phil got away. In fact, Silvio says, Phil had already gone into hiding days earlier. Tony has just made his first move on the chessboard only to learn that he is already two moves behind.

Janice also arrives at the Soprano home around this time, hoping to get Tony to fork over some money to help support Corrado. Tony mentions to her that he is emptying the swimming pool because “it costs a fortune to heat.” But we can guess the actual reason is because AJ is back home from the psych ward and Tony doesn’t want a repeat of the suicide attempt. The fake excuse Tony gives to his sister is another example of the masquerading and façading that fills this episode. 

AJ seems fairly stable at home, but he raises his mother’s and sister’s eyebrows when he watches a program about the bloody street-fighting taking place in Iraq. This clip playing on the Soprano TV comes from a documentary, America at a Crossroads: Warriors, that had aired on PBS two months before this episode originally airedAccording to its description on, the documentary explores how “for many of the American men and women in Iraq, the strongest motivation is a need to serve and feel part of something bigger than themselves.” We remember that Tony had gotten a sense that he was part of “something bigger” during his hospital stay (particularly after reading the mystical Ojibwe quote pinned to the wall). AJ now seems primed to have a similar epiphany, and this documentary may help inspire his decision to join “something bigger”—the military—in the next episode. But I think the presence of the war documentary here is notable for another reason too. When we consider the Metalocalypse imagery earlier, this is the second time this hour that we’re getting a reference to very bloody violence on a TV screen within our TV screen.

Despite all the screentime devoted in “The Blue Comet” to AJ’s problems and the mob warfare that is looming over everything, maybe the most notable event of the hour is Melfi’s termination of Tony’s therapy. (Heads up: I’m going to devote quite a bit of space to breaking her decision down.) In the previous episode, Elliot mentioned Samuel Yochelson’s and Stanton Samenow’s The Criminal Personality, and the study comes up again now at a dinner party. There is some question among viewers as to whether Elliot instructed the dinner guest to bring up the study. I’m undecided on the matter. I think it certainly could be within Elliot’s nature to give such an instruction, but even he did, I don’t think the dinner guest would have clearly known Elliot’s motivations to do so. Elliot seems quite eager to confront Melfi about her mobster client in front of their colleagues. (When he mentions “rescue fantasy” during an unrelated dinner table conversation, we can guess he is trying to steer the conversation towards Melfi’s years-long attempt to “rescue” Tony.) Elliot eventually “outs” Melfi’s patient when he refers to him as “Leadbelly.” It’s a pretty clever reference—I’ll give Elliot that. But was it proper of him to divulge the info? Dr. Jan Van Schaik, chair of the Ethics Committee at the Wisconsin Psychoanalytic Institute, found Elliot’s disclosure to be “a very egregious ethical violation.” Elliot seems to have engaged in some douchebag behavior here in revealing a patient’s identity, but putting that aside, he does bring up a valid question: should Melfi drop this particular patient? Keith Jarrett’s “Sympathy” playing over the sound system during the dinner party perhaps reflects the “sympathy” that has guided Melfi’s approach toward Tony Soprano. But she seems ready now to reevaluate the tack she has long taken.

Back at home, Melfi reviews Yochelson and Samenow’s study. Maybe it was hearing from a couple of female colleagues that treating criminals has very limited results—as opposed to hearing Elliot mansplain it to her—that causes Melfi to reevaluate now. Chase, somewhat heavy-handedly, does an extreme close-up of the study’s text: “Therapy has potential for non-criminals; for criminals, it becomes one more criminal operation.”

In an interview for Fox News a few days after this episode aired, Dr. Samenow said that Melfi was being “duped” by Tony Soprano the same way that he and Yochelson had been duped by the criminals they had studied. (Dr. Yochelson could not comment for himself as he had passed away in 1976.) In addition to reading The Criminal Personality, David Chase consulted psychologist Nancy Duggan to get an idea where the experts stood on Tony’s treatment. Duggan believed that Dr. Melfi was enabling the mobster more than she was helping him. Although there was a somewhat widespread feeling among mental health professionals that Melfi was justified in terminating Tony’s treatment, there was much head-scratching, even outrage, at the manner in which Melfi dumped him. Many fans felt the same way.

I don’t think Melfi went into their next session gunning to sever their relationship. But everything Tony talks about, from his gratitude toward medical professionals to Meadow’s choice of career to AJ’s emotional problems, seems to strengthen Melfi’s suspicion that Tony is conning her. She starts taking potshots at him. Her rebuke, “So the boy who never cared about anything now cares about too much,” is particularly harsh considering that the “boy” just recently tried to kill himself. Melfi is clearly growing emotional. Tony tells her if they had instant replay, she’d see that she is being unfair. (She hides behind the fact that they of course don’t have instant replay.) As I mentioned in my write-up for the Pilot, David Chase chose a style of editing and operating the camera for all the scenes in Melfi’s office that is very restrained, very austere. We now recognize that this restrained style may have had the effect, intended or unintended, of hiding the growing tensions in Melfi’s heart. Her heart has become a tinderbox ready to explode.

Melfi keeps pecking at everything Tony says, finally attacking him—rather unprofessionally—for “defacing my reading materials” because Tony had torn a recipe out of a magazine earlier in her waiting room. Many viewers have noted the irony: it is a Departures magazine that precipitates Tony’s “departure” from Melfi’s care. I think that the nature of the magazine as well as its name may be relevant here; it is a “luxury lifestyle” magazine owned by American Express and distributed to the company’s Platinum Card customers. Tony steals a page out of the lux-life magazine just as surely as he has been “stealing” tips and ideas for how to bolster his criminal luxury-lifestyle from Dr. Melfi for years now. As Prof. Franco Ricci suggests in his book Born Under A Bad Sign, Tony has long been “defacing” Melfi’s words in order to be a more effective mobster.

Melfi recommends that Tony begin “psychodynamic therapy combined with Anafranil” and offers a referral to another doctor. Tony protests, quite reasonably, that his son has just gotten out of the hospital and there may be something irresponsible, even immoral, in her leaving him out in the lurch at this time. She thinks about this for a moment and then gives him what is probably a bullshit response: “Since you are in crisis, I don’t want to waste your time.” Tony was not the only one shocked by the speed and suddenness with which Melfi nixed his therapy—many viewers including myself were disturbed by it too. I’m not willing to chalk her behavior up to “female menopausal situations”—I’m no gynecologist but I don’t think that’s which way the wind blows. I just figured that her arguably inappropriate and unseemly behavior was simply coming out of the emotional state that she was in. Now that she believes that she has been the victim of a long con by Tony Soprano, she feels outrage. As with the case of Phil Leotardo’s stance toward Tony in this hour, Melfi’s stance is being driven primarily by emotion rather than by professionalism or reason.

I think Jeff Goldberg at spoke for many viewers when he gave his explanation for Melfi’s actions: “What she feels, I’m guessing, is shame at her vicarious thrill-seeking, which is the real reason she kept Tony on her rolls for so long. And which is the reason we’ve watched the show for so long, Dr. Melfi being, of course, the stand-in for every law-abiding member of The Sopranos’ audience, who shouldn’t derive delight from the actions of violent mobsters but who do anyway.”

Very sensible explanation, it might very well be the case that Dr. Melfi got caught up in indulging the guilty pleasure of treating this exciting and thrilling client. (We might remember that she had once privately complained how boring some of her other patients can be, and in episode 2.05 she stormed out of a session with Elliot after he suggested that she was getting a “vicarious thrill” through Tony—Elliot’s words clearly hit very close to the bone.) Her guilt at having Tony Sopranos as a client finally seems to have surpassed her pleasure. The question of complicity has been a long-running concern of the show, and Melfi must be grappling with it now. In episode 6.03 “Mayham,” Melfi had to supply the word to Carmela when Carmela couldn’t bring herself to say it; now, Melfi may be confronting whether she too has been “complicit” in Tony’s criminality.

All of this seemed like a reasonable enough explanation for Melfi’s behavior, but then something happened that led me to broaden my take. In my most recent re-watch of the hour, prior to starting this write-up, I remembered that this wasn’t actually the first time we’ve heard Melfi suggest an alternative form of therapy to Tony while trying to hand him off to another doctor. I checked my notes, and sure enough, Melfi had suggested Behavior Modification therapy to Tony when trying to nix their relationship back in “Employee of the Month” (3.04). I decided to watch that memorable Season 3 episode once again—Melfi and Tony may not have the luxury of “instant replay,” but we do—and it has supplemented the way I see Melfi’s actions now. I’ll give a quick recap of the relevant moments in that episode to explain what I mean.

In Melfi’s first scene of 3.04, ex-husband Richard is trying to convince her to toss her conniving client: “He’s an expert at this. The guy is conning you…It really concerns me that you don’t see this. Pink-slip this guy. He’s dangerous.” In the next scene, Melfi asks Tony if he brought the log she had asked him to keep. Tony has clearly forgotten, and she is clearly disappointed. In the following scene, she admits to her own therapist that “Richard was right. I’ve been charmed by a sociopath.” Melfi mistakenly blurts out the name of her mobster client to Elliot, who then suggests sending him to a Behaviorist. 

Back in her office, Melfi takes Elliot’s suggestion and tells Tony it may be time for him to move onto Behavior Modification therapy with another doctor. But T pushes back against the idea, and he does it manipulatively and with bluster: “You know, you’re fuckin unbelievable. I ask you to get serious, but when it gets hard, you pawn me off on somebody else.” Of course, we know that Tony didn’t actually try to get Melfi to be more serious—he was the one not taking therapy seriously. Melfi gets startled by Tony’s pushback and she retreats, claiming that Behavior Modification therapy was merely a suggestion. (It’s almost like the time she retreated into being, in her words, “a little girl” at the sight of Tony in 2.03 “Toodle-fucking-oo.”) In the next sequence, she is walking through the stairwell of her office building while talking to Richard on her cellphone. She gets defensive about her failed attempt to cancel her client: “I told you I would discharge him, and I will in my own good time.” She is so engrossed in the conversation that she doesn’t notice the man in the red hat who eyes her with evil intent as they pass each other on the stairs…

In her 2006 memoir On The Couch, Lorraine Bracco writes that:

Shooting the rape scene was a more physically violent experience than I could have imagined. I felt the degradation. My body burned with pain when I was slammed down in the stairwell. It was so realistic that I tore the bursal sac in my shoulder and was in real pain. I had to have laparoscopic surgery to repair the damage. It wasn’t just me—doing that scene was traumatic for the whole crew. Many people on the set cried during the filming. The brutality was absolutely necessary. It was not gratuitous; it was real. So much of the violence we see on the screen—especially on television—is airbrushed so that it doesn’t appear as gut-wrenchingly awful as it is. I think it’s a disservice, because violence against another human being is despicable and it should be seen as despicable. You should be revolted.

After she is raped, she dreams of a Rottweiler that attacks her attacker. She wakes from the nightmare to find Richard resting peacefully beside her with a sleeping mask on. He is, in a sense, “blind” to her distress:

sleeping mask

Back in Elliot’s office, she interprets the Rottweiler to be a dream-symbol of Tony Soprano. Tony would never turn a blind eye to her if she reached out to him for protection or revenge. In their next session—the final scene of 3.04—Tony agrees that maybe the Behavior Modification therapy she had suggested would be a good idea. But Melfi quickly squashes that notion. “I’ve been getting the distinct feeling that you’re giving me the boot,” Tony continues with a smirk, confident now that he will not be kicked out of this office. Sitting before her potential savior, with the fresh trauma still weighing heavily upon her, Melfi loses her composure and begins to break down. Tony tries to comfort her, and then asks, “You wanna say somethin?” She gathers herself and resolutely, memorably, says “No.” 

We understand that Melfi’s “No” meant that she would not break the social contract, would not use Tony to mete out vigilante justice. But it’s clearer to me now that she was also saying “No” to her thoughts about kicking Tony out; if she had utilized Tony to get vengeance on her assailant, I don’t think she in good conscience could have continued to treat him as a patient. Saying “No” assured that her association with the big and powerful mobster would continue. Richard and Elliot had her best interest in mind when they tried to nurse her thoughts about severing Tony’s treatment, but these two men were utterly powerless in protecting her or avenging her after the violent and revolting experience she went through. The rape, in a sense, sent Melfi down an alternate timeline in SopranoWorld. She was getting ready to give Tony the boot, but then changed her mind after being assaulted. She had told her ex-husband that she would discharge Tony “in her own good time,” but the attack put a delay in her plan. Now, in “The Blue Comet,” that time has finally arrived…

Melfi opens her door and stands by it, an unambiguous signal to Tony that it is time for him to go—permanently. Many viewers have noted over the years that Melfi’s office seems to have an oval, almost womb-like shape. We never see any sharp corners along its walls. Professor Ricci notes that the space’s “absence of corners and shadowed recesses privilege openness and honesty.” But Tony Soprano has trampled on those concepts of openness and honesty; he has routinely disrespected this place. He is thus being kicked out of this corner-less room into a world where he is increasingly cornered and isolated. 

Tony steps through the door into the waiting room. The first episode of The Sopranos, we all remember, opened in this waiting room. I suggested in my first write-up that David Chase may have shot Tony through the legs of the female sculpture in this room in order to diminish his masculine power. In her memoir, Bracco writes that it was her idea for the sculpture to be placed here:

I fought to get that sculpture included. It’s the work of the incredible artist Robert Graham [who is thanked in the credits of “The Blue Comet”], and I thought it reflected Melfi’s aesthetic sense. I wanted it known that Melfi wasn’t a stiff cardboard cutout of a therapist. She was a living, breathing woman, with interests outside of her office.

Jennifer Melfi (and Lorraine Bracco) may have made the effort to mark the office as the personalized space of “a living, breathing woman,” but big ol’ Tony Soprano came in and, over a period of years, in his own unique way, managed to make the space his own. Melfi is taking her space back now. On his way out of the waiting room, Tony makes a big show of placing the torn page back into the Departures magazine. Melfi doesn’t flinch at his ridiculous gesture. She knows that he will never be able to steal her words again. 

I know that I cannot reasonably assert that Chase wanted us to think of “Employee of the Month” (much less go back and re-watch it) when trying to understand Melfi’s reasons for putting an end to Tony’s treatment. And without the details of “Employee” close at hand, it may be a little bit harder to see Melfi’s cancellation of Tony as a tale of Feminine Strength Regained. Or maybe it’s not that hard to see, I don’t know. Maybe I’m just mansplaining something that’s very obvious to many viewers. In any case, I think that the last image Chase gives us of Dr. Melfi bolsters this particular reading of her final storyline. Our last glimpse of Melfi on The Sopranos comes as she resolutely, confidently, closes the door of her office. The shot has always made me think of the final moments of The Godfather, but now I can see better how the callback to that great film functions more as a contrast rather than a comparison:

2 Doors

In Coppola’s movie, the put-upon, passive, manipulated wife can only watch as the door is closed on her. She is shut out of the dark-paneled room where the men conduct their business (just as she is shut out of virtually all halls of power as a woman in 1950s America). She has just been lied to by her husband. She has some intuition that her spouse isn’t the type of man he claims to be, but she is incapable of acting upon this intuition. In contrast to Kay at the end of The Godfather, Jennifer Melfi has found her strength and power. She definitively and decisively closes the door on this part of her life.

TV critic Glenn Garvin of The Miami Herald noted that it is not long after Tony is dismissed from Melfi’s office that he empties his backyard swimming pool; now that the office where he explored the significance of the ducks in the pool is no longer available to him, Tony wants to make sure that the ducks don’t have a place to come back to. Garvin’s insight helps us to see a connection that is being made now, a connection eight years in the making: early in Season 1, Melfi had helped Tony recognize that his anxiety about the ducks in the pool was really an anxiety about losing his family, and now 8 years later he drains that same pool because of his anxiety about losing a member of his family to suicide.

So, no more ducks and no more Dr. Melfi for Tony Soprano. Some viewers were happy that the good doctor was finally out of the picture. For some viewers, nothing would be more frustrating than having to watch Tony and Melfi prattle on in the Final Episode, an hour they hoped would be filled with blood and boobs and bullets. Chase, as I mentioned before, plays with the question of would The Sopranos have an unconventional ending or a more traditional ending throughout this episode; by removing Melfi from the narrative now, Chase seems to hint that the finale will be “less yakking, more whacking.”

At Vesuvio restaurant, Tony puts on a masquerade for his wife. He tells Carmela, “I quit therapy,” when in reality he was expelled from therapy. When Artie and Charmaine Bucco start to walk over to their table, Tony murmurs, “Here we go,” and the Soprano couple ready themselves to do some heavy-duty masquerading. First, they feign total happiness about Meadow and Patrick Parisi’s relationship. Then they try to pretend how pleased they are about Meadow’s decision not to go to medical school. Tony stumbles trying to think of a good reason why he’s pleased about it and starts mumbling something about the AIDS virus. Carmela comes to his rescue, mentioning all the problems doctors have go through with insurance companies and hospital cutbacks. But then, Carmela—caught up in her own storytelling—goes a little bit overboard, questioning if the compassion and patience that doctors need come naturally to Meadow. Tony doesn’t come to Carmela’s rescue now, but instead defends his beloved daughter: “What are you talking about??” When the Buccos query how AJ is doing, the Sopranos can answer only with monosyllables: “Good. Good.” They are stumbling through their masquerade and are losing the energy to continue it. Artie and Charmaine come to both their rescues now: Artie directs Tony’s attention to “Man-genius” (Eric Mangini, the Jets’ head coach), while Charmaine whisks off to order some limoncellos in celebration of Meadow and Patrick.

I’m getting a little sentimental again re-watching this scene, because this is the last time we will see Artie and Charmaine on the series. As an Autopsy commenter recently pointed out, there is something of a parallel between the names “Arthur”/”Anthony” and “Charmaine”/”Carmela,” suggesting that the Bucco couple can be seen as the non-criminal counterpart of the Soprano couple. Surely, Artie and Charmaine have put up façades from time to time (as we all do). But Anthony and Carmela’s entire public life must perpetually be a façade. 

I’ve always argued that “fuckin regularness” is a fundamental part of life, ubiquitous and inescapable. In SopranoWorld, we see that the banality of life can also act as a façade, masking a potential of violence that lays just below the surface of everyday life. That calm façade gets shattered towards the end of this hour. Bobby Baccalieri goes into a hobby shop, leaving his cell phone in his car (which is why he misses Silvio’s warning call). He gets smitten with an $8000 Blue Comet train—it evokes for him the days of yore, a bygone American era (reminiscent of what Tony complained of missing out on back in the Pilot episode). There was always a gentleness to Bobby that made him different from the other guys. When the shop owner remarks that he can enjoy the train set with his son, there is something heartbreaking about Bobby’s response: “He don’t care.” That wistful statement become Bobby’s last words. Bacala’s final sequence is a showpiece of camerawork and editing. The camera dollies through the store, tracking the hitmen between the aisles. Chase inserts images of toy figurines and customers all the while crosscutting to a model train running along its track. Part of the power of this scene, I think, comes from how different its editing style is from the style that is usually employed on the series. In an interview for Post magazine published a few years before this episode aired, editor William Stich said:

In a lot of ways The Sopranos is a conventional show. We don’t use a lot of swish pans, we don’t use a lot of Steadicam that you cut from movement to movement constantly. Not a lot of quick cuts here and there. It’s basic good filmmaking. Shooting your master, shooting your over-the-shoulders, shooting your close-ups and having good composition. And you don’t have to over-stylize something, because you have a good script.

This sequence in the hobby shop is definitely more stylized and dynamic than what Sopranos viewers are used to seeing. I think a couple of the stylized images are particularly noteworthy:

The shot of the toy train barreling off its track activates a metaphor—SopranoWorld is running off its rails:

train 2

The wrecked toy model of the city of Newark, Prof. Maurice Yacowar writes, “parodies an empire crumbling”:

train 3

The closeup of a female figurine-spectator trying to stifle a gasp might represent what I have previously referred to as “the Culture of Spectacle”:

train 1

The author Mario Vargas Llosa, as I’ve mentioned before, is profoundly critical of modern civilization for valuing spectacle above all else. Unfortunately, many of our producers, directors and TV showrunners are not so critical as Llosa is. They don’t want to lose the ratings and dollars that the spectacular brings in. When one of the hobby shop customers (possibly one of the kids that were cowering on the floor) lets out a series of blood-curdling screams at Bobby’s murder, David Chase is reminding us of the devastating toll that spectacle takes upon the spectator.

“The Blue Comet” keeps chugging along. Patsy and Silvio are attacked in the parking lot of the Bada Bing. Patsy is able to hoof it through some trees and escape unscathed, but Silvio takes multiple bullets. (Some earlier imagery of Silvio polishing his white shoes perhaps foretold that his luck would run out in this hour.) This shootout isn’t as visually graceful as the earlier shooting at the hobby shop, mainly because of some clumsy slo-mo shots that were inserted in. But I do think the scene’s overall editing, particularly the sound editing, is very well done. Great care was taken to match street sounds and engine sounds from shot to shot. The emphatic sounds of accelerating car engines heighten the sense of accelerating urgency within the narrative. (And the next scene, I’ll note here, opens on Tony’s accelerating Escalade, using the sound of the engine once again to sustain the mood of emergency.) A crowd of spectators from inside and around the Bing, including a couple of dancers, watches as the action unfolds around them. In the mayhem, a passing motorcyclist loses control of his bike and gets run over by a car.

Throughout the scene, we get small glimpses of the familiar Bada Bing sign. Susann Cokal, in her essay “Narrative Ergonomics and the Functions of Feminine Space in The Sopranos,” notes that the sign “shows a naked woman arcing backward, overcome by the enormity of an exclamation point that emphasizes the club’s name—a visual representation of the way a phallus overwhelms a woman, or a shock overwhelms a TV viewer.” The Bing sign is now overlooking what is certainly one of the most shocking and overwhelming sequences of the series. The inclusion of the topless dancers who watch the bullets fly makes this scene the second time this hour that Chase tosses a bone to his hits-and-tits fans. But I don’t think Chase suddenly decided to pander to his most lowbrow viewers here in this penultimate hour of the series. I believe he is making is a criticism of those of us who hanker for this type of spectacle. When we momentarily make eye-contact with one of the dancers who inadvertently glances into the camera, it unintentionally reinforces our self-awareness that we at home are gazing at the crowd that is gazing at the violence. We are the crowd. We are the rubberneckers. Chase gives us spectacle while censuring us for requesting such spectacle.

This idea of “providing spectacle” was one of the primary driving forces behind another HBO show, Game of Thrones. Thrones had no shortage of pageantry, histrionic characters and extravagant violence, and in “The Bells,” the penultimate episode of that series, showrunners David Benioff and D.B. Weiss gave in to their worst impulses, pandering specifically to their fire-and-flames, death-and-dragons viewers with little concern how the rest of their fans would take it. Kelly Lawler, in her review of that hour for USA Today, wrote “Where to begin with ‘The Bells,’ an absolute disaster of an episode that exhibited every bad habit the series’ writers have ever had? They threw out their own rule book (suddenly the scorpions don’t work and Drogon can burn everything?) to pursue gross spectacle.” Character-consistency and verisimilitude were tossed out the window by Benioff and Weiss, sacrificed for the sake of grand spectacle. (To Benioff and Weiss’ credit, the final episode was more reasonably constructed and, in my opinion, a pretty good end to a very fun series.)

Back to The Sopranos. Tony rushes home after the attacks on his men to evacuate his family. Rosalie Aprile is at the Soprano house with a newly discovered batch of photos from her trip to Paris with Carmela. (The mention of the Paris trip, with its investigation of difficult existential questions, perhaps implicitly brings those existential undertones into the current hour.) Tony tells Carm that Bobby is dead and instructs her to head out to the new property which she acquired in an estate sale. (Rosalie interrupts them after overhearing the conversation. “Anything I can do?” she helpfully asks. But she really doesn’t want to stay a minute longer in this house which may potentially become the site of a gangland shootout—“Or maybe I should just leave,” she artfully adds.)

Upstairs, AJ and Rhiannon are on a website reading about Adnan al Shukrijamah, wanted by authorities at the time for planning “dirty bomb” nuclear attacks on U.S. soil. So: AJ’s computer screen becomes the third time this hour that a screen within our screen references violence or potential violence. Tony directs Rhiannon out of the room, and then breaks the news to AJ about Bobby’s death. AJ doesn’t take it very well, and his immediate thoughts are about his own emotional state rather than about Bobby’s kids or Aunt Janice. When he starts to cry, Tony loses his temper and forcefully yanks wee AJ out of bed. (There’s a bit of irony in Tony’s reaction here; in the previous episode, Carmela lost her temper at Tony for “playing the depression card” and now Tony lashes out at AJ for something similar.) Even though I was a bit disappointed by AJ’s self-absorption here, I don’t think Tony’s response is justifiable at all. He gave his son barely even a moment to process his emotions. Tony plops the young man on his tailbone and drags him across the floor. A cord gets hooked on AJ’s foot, pulling his Xbox and DVDs and other possessions off of his well-stocked shelves:

AJ dragged with stuff

In the previous episode, AJ tied a concrete block to his leg before plopping himself into the swimming pool. I had suggested that the concrete block represented the gloom and nihilism of being a Soprano which had long been weighing him down. Now, as Tony pulls AJ across the floor, we see AJ’s leg “tied” to some of the goodies and products that come with a life of leisure and consumerism. This is a different type of weight, but perhaps just as heavy. As he leaves the room, Tony snickers dismissively at the laptop displaying the latest news developments around the globe. Tony would much rather see AJ spend his time doing the stuff a “normal” young man his age would do. Tony is clearly disappointed that all AJ was doing with Rhiannon—behind his closed bedroom door, no less—was investigating the war on terror. Poor AJ. Living as a Soprano is a difficult thing under the best of circumstances, but now he has to cope with the worst circumstances of being a Soprano. Maybe AJ shouldn’t even be at home; it’s possible Tony pulled him out of Mountainside because he didn’t want to foot the $2200/day bill any longer. Instead of giving his son the attention and support that he needs right now, Tony is busy dodging the bullet that is out there with his name on it.

Carmela and Meadow rush over to Janice’s house. As the Porsche pulls into the driveway of the large, luxurious home, we wonder if the cost of this house was worth the price the mobsters have paid for it. Johnny Sac, the previous owner, was sent to prison and had to spend his last, sad days in a medical lockup. Bobby was then able to get the house for a discounted amount, but now he has paid the ultimate price. Inside the house, Bobby III and Sophia, sitting across from Janice, seem to be in state of shock. Over the course of their young lives, they have had to contend not only with their mother dying and their father dying, but now also with the horrifying prospect of Janice being their one and only caregiver.

Tony and the rest of the fellas hide out in a safehouse. Silvio, of course, cannot be there—but a cardboard cutout of him is. (According to Alan Sepinwall, Chase and the writers wanted some way to include Silvio in this scene. So they conceived this house not only to be an emergency hideout but also a storage space for Bada Bing promotional items, like the cutout.) Tony heads upstairs, toting the giant gun that Bobby gave him for his birthday (in a scene we remember from the season opener). As Tony looks at the gun, he has a quick flashback to the moment from that birthday weekend when Bobby wondered whether a person who gets shot can “see it coming.” Obviously, Tony may be flashing back to that moment because he is wondering now whether Bobby saw it coming. But Chase, a master at setting up future scenes, may have included the flashback for reasons that will become clearer in the next episode… (I’ll be coming back to this flashback in my next write-up.)

Of the three men who met at Vesuvio earlier to strategize: Bobby is dead, Silvio is as good as dead, and Tony is scrambling to stay alive. Phil Leotardo is taking care of all loose ends—he’s not leaving any scraps in his scrapbook. The Tindersticks’ spooky song “Running Wild” closes the episode, its sparse piano ringing in the dark and adding to the feeling of suspense. (Although the track was recorded years earlier, it sounds like it could have been written specifically to score this scene.) As the end-credits roll, we understand that David Chase has laid down all the tinder-sticks needed to ignite a giant conflagration in the final hour. Right now, going into the series finale, it looks like Chase may not be leaving any scraps in his scrapbook either.


I want to circle back for a moment to the scene when Janice visits Tony’s house. Janice tells Tony that their uncle doesn’t like speaking to Mario Diaco, his accountant, because the man has an artificial voice-box which makes Corrado think he is from outer space. This mention of a “voiceless accountant” toward the end of The Sopranos caught my attention. This final season of the series has been rife with questions of karma, of justice, of a moral accounting. By placing a voiceless accountant in the show now, perhaps Chase is suggesting that SopranoWorld is not a place where a final moral accounting can be heard. Corrado hesitates to meet with the accountant because his dementia makes him mistake the man for a space alien. But in a sense, all of the gangsters, including Corrado, have always considered any sort of true accounting of their work to be an extra-terrestrial concept, foreign to the world they move in. With apologies to Phil Leotardo (and Ralphie and Richie and Feech and others), this lack of moral accounting is the true villain of the series. In his essay “The Sopranos, Film Noir and Nihilism,” Kevin Stoehr writes that “While the external villains in Tony’s life change from season to season, the internal villain in his life remains ever-present: his inability to take account of his own moral decline…” 

Mario Diaco most probably had his voice-box removed because of laryngeal cancer (overwhelmingly the reason why most laryngectomies are done). We remember that John Schwinn, back in “The Fleshy Part of the Thigh” (6.04), underwent a laryngectomy for this reason. I had suggested in my writeup for 6.04 that the significance of this plot-point might be that the man who gave Tony a less nihilistic way of looking at the universe—the man who suggested that Everything is Everything rather than a Big Nothing—was left voiceless in Chase’s cruel but realistic universe. And now we learn that the accountant, a man whose very purpose is to give a reckoning, has also been left voiceless in Chase’s universe.


The Yochelson and Samenow study had a considerable impact on Melfi and Tony’s relationship in SopranoWorld. In the real world, the study has been influential but has also received some criticism. There have been concerns raised about its methodology: for example, no control group was used, only male (no female) inmates were studied, and the 240 subjects that started the study winnowed to a small fraction of that number by study’s end. Yochelson and Samenow ultimately reached the conclusion that biological and social factors don’t play a very significant role in the behavior of criminals, a conclusion that is controversial and not universally agreed upon. I don’t think David Chase is necessarily making a comment about the merits or the flaws of the study when he places it in The Sopranos; I believe he uses it simply as a way to reignite a line of thinking that Dr. Melfi had abandoned years ago.

Nevertheless, the question of whether psychotherapy can help a criminal personality is fascinating. I’m not well-versed enough on the issue to give an intelligent answer. I have, however, often thought about how effective psychotherapy is in treating the nihilistic personality. My hunch is that psychotherapy—particularly when it’s just talk therapy with a couple of prescription drugs thrown in—is inadequate. I’ve always felt that the dread of “the Big Nothing” that nihilistic personalities must contend with is better addressed by Art. I’m not talking about going to some insurance-approved “art therapy” class once or twice a week, but rather immersing oneself in those profound works of film, literature, music etc that grapple with the deepest of existential questions. (Dr. Krakower suggested something similar in episode 3.07 “Second Opinion” when he told Carmela that her husband should read Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment.) But I know that not everyone has the time—or the inclination—to seek the balm and wisdom found in Art. And so I guess it’s a good idea for psychotherapists to leave some space in their calendars for all the nihilists out there seeking help.


I don’t want to make too much of AJ looking at three screens in this hour (2 TVs and a laptop) which each convey violence (or at least potential violence), but I do think it is interesting in that it reinforces the idea of AJ as a regular spectator to violence. Over the last few seasons, Chase’s camera has focused on AJ as he gawked at a fistfight outside a house party, gawked at his classmate Victor getting his toes acidified, and gawked at a young Somalian man getting beat down. AJ is the son of a mob boss, but ironically, these three instances of violence that he witnessed were not directly related to mob activity. They occurred within the flow of AJ’s daily life. Daily life in America may simply be more violent than it is in other first-world countries. The three screens within our screen in this hour self-reflexively underscore our perpetual exposure to violence. Regardless of whether or not the upcoming Grand Finale of The Sopranos will contain a massive bloodletting, we are not able to escape the spectatorship of violence that is a part and parcel of living in America.


As I mentioned earlier, the specific reason why Chase chose to use Departures magazine in Melfi’s office might be that its status as a luxury lifestyle magazine added an interesting subtext to the scene. After the series finale, many viewers also believed that that magazine was a clue of sorts pointing to Tony’s “departure” from the world of the living. But I wanted to come back to the magazine for an entirely different reason. There has always been some chatter among fans and even some of the Sopranos pundits out there about “product placement” on the series. While I’ve never really heard anybody claim that the Departures mag is another example of product placement, I did take a look at the credits to see if there was any info about this particular item there. I found that gratitude and credit is given to various companies and products, but not to American Express (which produced Departures at the time):


Viewers often make a charge of “product placement” despite not having any evidence, from the credits or otherwise, that the product was actually “placed” there with financial or advertising considerations in mind. Not too long ago, a podcaster described the Diet Coke that Matt Bevilaqua drinks just before he is killed in “From Where to Eternity” as product placement. Perhaps the podcaster has some inside information not available to the rest of us, but the credits of that episode don’t indicate that HBO was working with Coca Cola. Plus, the “placement” of the soda can in that scene is actually quite poor, as the brand name on the side of the can is mostly obscured by a napkin. Furthermore, the brand name “Diet Coke” is never spoken by anyone. (Also, I’m not convinced that Coca Cola would pay good money to have its product described as a “sugarless motherfucker.”) The podcaster seemed to assume that the mere presence of a brand name qualified it to be product placement. 

As I argued in my “Luxury Lounge” write-up, the use of name-brand products adds to the realism/verisimilitude of the show. Such realism strengthens the relationship between the viewers and the characters. Watching “From Where to Eternity,” we feel Matt Bevilaqua’s terror as these hulking mobsters tie him to a chair and question him. His mouth is predictably dry, and we understand his urge to gulp down the Diet Coke. David Chase could have had Big Pussy hand him a can with some made-up name printed on its side, something like “Dr. Salter,” for example. But doing so could have taken the viewer out of the moment; we might find ourselves thinking, even if only for a second or two, “I’ve heard of Dr. Pepper but I’ve never heard of Dr. Salter. Is that supposed to be some kind of salty root beer?” All of the universe-building, all of the suspension of disbelief, all of the work that had been done to build tension up to that point could have taken a momentary hit. 

While realism strengthens the relationship between character and viewer, product placement tends to diminish it. A silent third-party essentially comes between the character and viewer to oversee the hawking of their product. The on-screen character is reduced to being a vehicle for an advertisement while the viewer at home is reduced to being a mark. I’m not naïve—I’m aware that HBO has spoken with various companies about the appearance of their products on The Sopranos. But the details of these talks are somewhat murky. We don’t know if money was ever exchanged or if HBO simply enjoyed the free use of the products, nor do we know the extent to which the companies had a say in what was seen or heard onscreen (if they had any say at all.) I know that HBO isn’t some hippy socialist collective trying to bring a golden era of peace upon the earth—they are a network running a business in the cutthroat world of television. Still, we need to be careful not to make unfounded, haphazard accusations of product placement on The Sopranos, because we might then be guilty of making an egregious error: we mistake an attempt to increase realism as an attempt to increase profits.


This year has rained a shitstorm on us like we have never fucking seen. A global pandemic, economic downturn, locked-down cities, Kobe Bryant’s death, George Floyd’s death, protests, riots and killings in American streets, murder hornets, West coast wildfires, an endless run of hurricanes and storms, unsettling events in the political sphere—the list goes on and on. If ya ask me, you can take 2020 and give it back to the Indians. Perhaps as Americans, we’re not as equipped to deal with such chaos as the rest of the world is. Svetlana Kirilenko told Tony as much in “The Strong, Silent Type” (4.10) when she said, “That’s the trouble with you Americans. You expect nothing bad ever to happen when the rest of the world expects only bad to happen—and they are not disappointed.”

In March, just as coronavirus was forcing the country to go into a shutdown, Netflix released its original docu-series Tiger King. A goofy soap opera of misfits and miscreants, Tiger King was exactly the escapist entertainment that we needed at the time. It had heroes and it had villains (and part of the fun was trying to decide which was which). Though not very poignant, the show occasionally managed to be sweet. Tiger King’s editing style—subtly borrowed from reality shows—exploited the sensational nature of the storylines, making the series one of the most talked about shows of the year. Adding to its popularity was the fact that it was remarkably meme-able. The lockdown meant we had lots of time on our hands to pass around memes like this one:

tiger king2

But I wondered if the popularity of Tiger King was being fueled by something more subterranean than simple escapist longing. Putting on my Captain Subtext hat, I wondered if the series struck such a nerve because it was reflecting the situation we found ourselves in: we were having to confront wild nature in the form of a dangerous virus much the same way people on the show confronted wild nature in the form of dangerous tigers. As much as we’d like to believe that we’re safe and secure from the threats of untamed nature in our cities and towns, the virus reminds us that the entire world is essentially a jungle. Walking through the aisles of a grocery store during the pandemic now, we may feel an anxiety similar to that felt by our hunter-gatherer forebears as they foraged for food in primal settings tens of thousands of years ago, and it is that same primordial anxiety that drives the narrative of Tiger King. Or perhaps not, I don’t know. I readily admit that I may be reading too much into Netflix’s show about a gay, gun-toting zookeeper.

Another show that found great popularity this year was our very own Sopranos. As with Tiger King, a variety of reasons probably accounted for The Sopranos’ newfound popularity, chief among them being the lockdown. A pair of new podcasts hosted by Drea de Matteo and Michael Imperioli surely also contributed. Another factor may have been the introduction of HBO’s new HBO-MAX streaming service. But here too, I wondered if there weren’t subconscious elements contributing to the Sopranos lovefest. Perhaps we recognize at a deep, almost subconscious level that the cultural concerns that David Chase explored in his TV series years ago are closely connected to our contemporary worries. First airing in 1999, The Sopranos expressed various fin de siècle (end-of-century) concerns: the increasing complications of the “American Dream” and the winding-down of the great “American Century.” We are now 20 years into the new century but are still grappling with some of those old concerns. Many Americans on both sides of the politico-cultural divide today feel that the country is headed down a wrong path. The pessimism on each side stems from two different, even opposite, sets of anxieties—and the horizon shows no clear signs of reconciliation or resolution. The Sopranos was a reflection of America’s troubled soul in the late ’90s/early ’00s. Most of us today do not have any greater clarity on these issues than we did back then, only a greater conviction that “our side” is on the right side of the ongoing battle for America’s soul.

Ever since 2007, the year The Sopranos ended, David Chase has no longer had his primary vehicle to make topical commentary about the state of the country. But he still seems to have the desire to do so. In May of this year, Chase sent newly written lines of dialogue imagining how various Sopranos characters would currently be dealing with the coronavirus to Michael Imperioli and Steve Schirripa to share on their podcast Talking Sopranos. The new lines, for example, expressed Meadow’s regret about choosing law school over medical school; Carmela’s happiness that Meadow didn’t become a doctor; and AJ’s astonishment at his younger self: “At one time I wanted to work for Trump. You believe it?! Fuck me, dude.” 

The lines Chase sent to Talking Sopranos seem to have been a one-off, we haven’t heard much from him since. If Chase was a memer, he would have had a way to express his thoughts about the current state of affairs with regularity. But he’s not a memer. And that’s why I think all the Sopranos meme accounts on social media are so important—they connect The Sopranos to the current world in a way that David Chase no longer can. My internet-buddy @sopranosgram does exactly that here:

sopranosgram covid2

A meme usually works only if it is instantly understood—otherwise we just keep on scrolling with barely any recognition of it. The Sopranos had so many memorable lines by so many memorable characters in so many memorable situations, and was so eminently re-watchable (further imprinting its lines and characters and scenes into our collective memory) that we are able to instantly recognize the joke or reference behind a Sopranos meme.

Sopranos meme accounts have helped make the series relevant to new, younger viewers. At the same time, the meme accounts may appeal to older, original viewers of the series in part because they evoke a certain nostalgia. As troubled as the first decade of this century was, it feels like those days were positively paradise compared to today. Hell, right now I feel nostalgic for just last year. I feel cautious today walking into a restaurant containing a dozen or so patrons, but a year ago I felt only enthusiasm walking into a convention center packed with thousands of people. SopranosCon, taking place in November of last year in Secaucus NJ, was quite a scene. Stocked with several Sopranos actors, fans in bathrobes and tracksuits, the horse that played “Pie-o-my,” recreations of various sets (including the Bing stage, staffed with actual dancers), plus almost anything else Sopranos-related you could think of (and some stuff you would never think of), the convention in some ways was itself a hothouse of nostalgia. Artist John Podgurski’s reproduction of the Satriale’s pig-mural became a popular and nostalgic spot for people to meet. I and Vik Singh (warm and convivial host of the Poda Bing podcast) enjoyed a sit-down in front of the green and pink painting:

pig mural 2

Perhaps some of Bobby Baccalieri’s nostalgic sentiment in this hour, as he pines for the days of sipping on a Negroni in the club car of the Blue Comet, has rubbed off on me. But I’m sure the bulk of my Sopranos sentimentality right now is coming from the knowledge that I will soon be wrapping up this years-long Autopsy project. Recently I came across some photos of the sets used at Silvercup Studios, and—to my surprise—the sight of the familiar furniture and set-decoration put a little lump in my throat:

Animated GIF-downsized_large (16)

There’s something strange, almost haunting, about seeing these production sets sitting lonesome in the cold glare of an empty studio. The disembodied sets, depopulated of all the familiar faces we’re used to seeing, serve as a reminder that the world of The Sopranos was not actually a real place. Chase’s consistent effort to portray SopranoWorld with realism and verisimilitude was so successful that it is sometimes easy for us to forget that the series was a crafted work of fiction, employing dozens upon dozens of technicians, designers, writers, actors and artisans to bring the fiction alive. David Chase was exceedingly good at marshaling the most exceptional people and resources together in order to breathe life into his fictional TV world. And that—more than nostalgia, current events, meme accounts, podcasts, blogs or anything else—accounts for the ongoing popularity of the series. We never get tired of revisiting a skillfully crafted work; its artistry has no expiration date. “A thing of beauty,” wrote the poet John Keats, “is a joy forever.”



  • Possible reference of “The Blue Comet” title?  In some interpretations of Hopi Indian prophecy, “the blue kachina” is a comet or star that signals the imminent end of all mankind. [But this interpretation may have been an invention/misunderstanding by a non-Hopi writer.]
  • White shoes.  As usual, Chase seems to undermine our reading of his images as fixed “symbols.” This hour makes a good case that white shoes symbolize death, but we also know that Paulie has a closet full of white loafers—and he manages to remain standing all the way through the end of the series.
  • It’s ironic (and probably a bit devious) that Janice tells Tony that she can’t afford to support Corrado any longer, yet her husband Bobby barely hesitates to blow $8000 on a train set. Tony is outraged that she would even approach him about their uncle: “You got a lot of balls, coming to me! And as for your husband, Janice—‘Exile on Main Street!'” We’ll never know just how serious Tony’s threat of excommunication was because Bobby gets killed in the following scene.
  • The song from Cavalleria Rusticana, which I mentioned plays at Vesuvio, also appears at the end of The Godfather III. <<< G.3 SPOILER ALERT: The music starts just after Michael Corleone’s daughter is killed, and this led some Sopranos viewers to predict that the series would end with the death of Tony Soprano’s daughter. >>>
  • Punning all the way to the end.  One of the guests at the dinner party claims, “All Italians have big noses.” He is not invoking an ethnic stereotype, as we are led to believe, but describing Italian wines.
  • During one scene at the Bada Bing, we can hear the dreamy but disturbing groove of The Doors’ “When the Music’s Over (Turn Out the Lights),” perhaps foreshadowing that the music and the lights will both suddenly go out at the end of the next hour.


Paulie 2020

Duly noted.

*       *       *       *       *       *       *       *

» If you would like to help support this site, please visit my PayPal or Venmo. Molte grazie! 
♠ instagram: @sopranos.autopsy
♣ twitter: @SopranoAutopsy
♥ facebook: Ron Bernard
♦ email:
© 2021 Ron Bernard

169 responses to “The Blue Comet (6.20)

  1. Thanks Ron. I enjoyed your insights on this one – especially the legwork behind the psychiatry stuff.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Yay! A new post! I’ll have to read this one again LOL! But I had to mention the “Metalocalypse” reference. Man I enjoyed that show, the premise sounds totally ridiculous (and it is) but it was just so…endearing, I guess I’d say. When I first saw this episode I had to rewind to verify I really saw that.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thank you for writing this, especially the Keats line; for the suggestion of Art immersion therapy for nihilists; and for the notes on Melfi’s last scene, as well as Artie and Charmaine’s. I love how Charmaine passive-aggressively shames Carmella for Meadow ‘staying in the family,’ as it were. Charmaine is still so smug in her choices and now relishes the inevitability of Meadow’s. Thank you so much for your expert analysis of this show. We met briefly at SopranosCon, I was thrilled. Looking back now, the whole experience was surreal but so satisfying. I have admired your criticism of the show tremendously since it began. I’m feeling sad to click to your final episode piece, but, like the show, I can always start it all over again. Best wishes!

      Liked by 2 people

  3. You bastard. The entire way through reading this I was thinking “but Paulie has shelves full of white loafers, and he doesn’t die, albeit responsible for a lot of death”, but you nixed me in the additional points.
    I wonder how many penultimate episodes of a season contain a death?

    Liked by 1 person

    • haha you never know what you might find in the Additional Points


    • I was just thinking:
      Maybe Paulie having a closet full of white shoes, but isn’t *wearing* them, signifies how this ridiculous, absurd old man has *outlasted* everyone. He survives, but everyone around him dies. And the final lingering shot of him next episode is him all alone outside a desolate Satriale’s. Even Tony (probably) dies. Paulie’s numerous white shoes are the deaths of his FRIENDS (and enemies… the big trail of ghosts from From Where To Eternity), that have built up into a collection over the years.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Tony whupping AJ is foreshadowed in the final Melfi session. He muses that he should “put his foot up his Ass”. You wonder if his confrontation with Melfi in some way caused him to attack AJ. This was a way to lash out at her and to reject her as she certainly would have disapprove and tried to coach him out of such behavior.
    Thanks for the write-ups and glad to have you back.

    Liked by 4 people

    • That’s a good take…


    • He didn’t really attack him. He had to get him out of bed and moving. There was no time to hold his hand. Even Carmela commented and said “how are we gonna get him out of the bed, much less out of the house?” His reply “He’ll get up.” Sometime expediency is a good motivator. two people he knows his whole life are shot, one died and he’s is whining like a baby. I don’t blame Tony for pulling him out of bed. He had to get him moving, no time for coddling.

      Liked by 2 people

  5. Well worth the wait Ron, so much to feast on. Thanks for your hard work over all these years. Happy Thanksgiving!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Okay, here’s my first thought. I saw Tony’s look when he saw what was on AJ’s computer as concern because the troubling thoughts are still there in AJ’s mind. He had no time to coddle him because they had to get the hell out of the house. I couldn’t help thinking that maybe less coddling would have done AJ good. I still get the feeling that he is not as depressed as he says he is, I think he is self-pitying and Tony gets frustrated. I also think its going to be an ongoing syndrome with AJ. Self-involvement, and a disconnect from how other people feel. Yes, he is angry that he is a Soprano and has to deal with this…but still, he doesn’t seem scared.

    Liked by 3 people

    • AJ was coddled? When? He was judged and yelled at by his parents for the entirety of the series.


      • When he vandalized the school? When he cheated on tests? When he smart mouthed his mother? When he lied and stayed at the hotel and got drunk and high and cursed at his mother and lied continuously?He can’t move out because he needs his mothers cooking?? He was lazy and stupid and dishonest and they always got him out of trouble. He was coddled because the mother parents out of guilt and fear, and the father is a criminal. They gave him everything and he was a little snot nose.


        • Totally agree…..Tony was right when he said all that stood between AJ and a sounds thrashing’s was his mother….

          Liked by 1 person

        • not to mention his uncle jr. fuckup that would have gotten an average nobody a possible attempted murder charge but no no no not crybaby bitch AJ Soprano who complains “my stomach hurts” as Tony’s leaving the police station in disbelief over his current fuck up of all fuck ups.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Ha, when was dude NOT coddled? Just because his parents yelled at him didnt mean they didnt baby that little fker.


    • I think people are as tough as they need to be, generally. Look at the survivors of world war 2, the Holocaust, the misery of that eras. Many of those people emerged as contributing, well adjusted productive members of society. AJ is the end result of the post world war 2 degradation of the American male. His great grandparents were immigrants who escaped poverty, his grandparents grew up hard and mean in the ole ethnic enclaves and his dad was the last in line to have that sort of upbringing. By the time you get to AJ, there’s nothing left but nihilism and easy living and coddling and made up maladies like add. That’s the message of the series to me, or at least one of the main ones…..

      Liked by 2 people

  7. So glad to get one of these in time for Thanksgiving

    Liked by 1 person

  8. I literally went “OHHH!” and woke up the cat when I saw this was updated. Awesomeness. It had the effect of a jump scare in a movie, but a nice one.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Hallelujah! Been checking this site pretty much daily.
    I imagine you have your work cut out for you for the next instalment. I wonder if you’ll end it in mid-sentence?

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Ron, there’s no thanks I can give that can accurately convey the gratitude I have for what you’ve done on this website.

    At surface-view, it would seem quite unlikely that a show like the The Sopranos would have any deep resonance with one such as myself–a geeky, black, Gen Z-er living in the Midwest. However, therein lies one of the key attributes of American Myth that perhaps make it the central myth of the world–a story of one facet of the United States is irrevocably entwined in all its others.

    Everything is Everything, and I am absolutely down with that.

    Your musings on Spectacle gave me somewhat of an epiphany. The Sopranos–a numinous, mythic, phantasmagoria dressed in the skin of mundane, urban criminality–presents us the world as we know it before slowly cracking it open to reveal the bottomless realms and potentialities we’ve been unknowingly standing atop of. For me, THAT IS the Spectacle. Not flashy, not even a slow-burn, but more like the steady, beating pulse of a universal onmi-image stirring something dormant, yet eternal, in our cores.

    …………and yeah, the shoot-outs and big titties are cool, too.
    Thank you, again.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. “the order to carry out the plan passes from Bobby to Paulie to Patsy to Corky Caporale to the two Italians. (Butchie had earlier criticized New Jersey’s redundant layers of management.)”

    It’s like a game of telephone.. Tony seems to give Bobby a look when he asks ‘who do you want to take care of it?’ Why does he involve Paulie at all? Amateur power move as a result of their beef from the Italian festival in the previous season maybe? Or is it just bad management? But then why is Silvio there and not making sure it goes more smoothly? Paulie doesn’t want to be involved at all because he wants to survive which leads to him putting patsy in charge. Patsy, who has every reason not wanting to be 4th in line barely seems interested (“does he speak Ukrainian?” “The fuck do I know?”) and on and on it goes this thing of ours..

    “Maybe our guys are nothing more than “a glorified crew” after all.”

    I’ve always thought these quotes about Jersey being a lesser outfit were bullshit to be honest. I think the way the New York guys talk shit is similar to how real New Yorkers kind of look down on Jersey and it’s more of these alpha guys having a dick measuring contest. If you look at the facts, the two times the term ‘glorified crew’ came up were: 1) On the golf course when Johnny Sac was trying to convince Carmine of the importance of the relationship with NJ on a business deal until Carmine Jr. got pissy cause Carmine said Tony was like a son. Carmine loses his temper and uses the phrase. 2) This episode where Phil uses the phrase cause of his own beef (and even then his consigliere is like “whacking a boss, you sure?”). Not to mention the boss of a prominent family in Italy gives away her best/most loyal soldier and cousin. I doubt she’d do this if they were just some under-respected, under-valued “glorified crew”

    Don’t have anything to add to the Tony-Melfi dynamic analysis except that it was incredibly insightful and well written as usual, Ron. Literally gave me goosebumps reading it.

    Also the Lorraine bracco book sounds incredibly well written as well. How much sopranos stuff is in there? Is it worth a read for someone who isn’t particularly interested in most of her other work?

    “This idea of “providing spectacle” was one of the primary driving forces behind another HBO show, Game of Thrones.”

    I hate to be ‘that guy’ but this show got worse and worse the more they ran out of source material (or decided they were better writers aka 4.5 seasons in) but I can’t recommend the books enough (although I have to warn you the books are unlikely to ever get finished.. Still definitely worth the read though)

    “Viewers often make a charge of “product placement” despite not having any evidence,”

    Never understood this complaint. Products in the sopranos always seem naturally introduced and never forced. For example when Tony orders Chinese on the phone and orders cans of coke.. If he said cans of cola or something it just would’ve sounded ridiculous. Or when the commercial for Mercedes is on tv and it makes Tony think of Gloria. It wasn’t in there to promote Mercedes, it was in there to remind Tony and the audience about this beautiful woman who might became a major player in future episodes while at the same time leaving Carmela completely oblivious as to what Tony (and the audience) are thinking. I’m not sure they could’ve achieved that without the commercial but either way it worked perfectly. If done naturally and with purpose there’s nothing wrong with putting products in your tv show or movie in my opinion

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Finally! I am happy that the analysis has been uploaded (great as always, by the way) but at the same time I’m sad because there is only one left and I’m afraid the analysis will end with: “and the real meaning of The Sopranos ending is…”.
    I haven’t rewatched The Sopranos and The Wire this year (which I regret) but I watched seasons 4-7 of Mad Men and then I rewatched the entire show and couldn’t help but compare the chaos of 1968 shown in season 6 to the chaos of this year. It was especially shocking to see the King-assassination riots episode and that a few months later the George Floyd protests occurred.

    Liked by 3 people

    • I read a book once that studied the 100 most shocking events of human history, and one of the events on their list was the year “1968.” Lots of parallels to that year now in 2020..

      Liked by 2 people

  13. Always brilliant to have another one of these! The analysis is worthy of the subject matter, which is the highest praise I can give. Great work Sir!!

    Liked by 1 person

  14. I think Melfi’s dropping Tony as a client also works as a meta dropping of the audience by Chase himself. We never really had to think about what everything actually meant before this point. Why did Tony dream that? Melfi / Chase will tell us. If they don’t, it’s probably not important or it’s simply “bad writing”. Tony never actually read into anything and neither did we, the audience. And what happened when Melfi / Chase wasn’t there to guide us one last time? We got one of the most divisive final episodes in television history. Can’t wait for you to review it, Ron!

    Liked by 2 people

  15. I just wanted to say thanks tbh. Great work.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Can we identify if one of the shooters that gets Sil is wearing a members only jacket?

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Thanks for another excellent write up, Ron!
    Bobby’s murder scene has always unsettled me on a lot of levels. The sequence on its own is great film, and it works, but to me the stylized nature of the editing choices seemed too on the nose and kind of beneath what the series could – and still would – accomplish with its storytelling.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yeah I know what you mean. It’s a bit too choreographed, something like the ‘Union Station stairway’ scene in the film The Untouchables. But I think Chase is showing that he can do conventional gangster-movie fare with great technique and flair before going in a very unconventional direction in the Finale…


  18. Enough with the preambles………..Thank you Ron

    Liked by 2 people

  19. One more review to go, and I can die a happy man XD !!!

    Liked by 1 person

  20. I found your website a couple of months ago after returning to The Sopranos after what must have been 10 years or more and have steadily read through all of the (available) episode analyses and comments. When it was first released, I watched all episodes 10-15 times, mainly when I was a student between about 17-23 years old. I was obsessed with it, but couldn’t enunciate why I knew it was so amazing, intricate and multi-layered – this website has been a fantastic resource for analysis and insight, for people like myself who are not ‘au fait’ with various televisual/filming techniques and tricks. It’s a real old-skool website that reminds me of the early days of the internet where websites were produced by individuals with a passion or interest, rather than SEO, advertisement-driven, click bait nonsense that makes up 99% of the websites I visit day to day.
    It has also been illuminating to me to learn about the philosophical, existential and spiritual questions that run through The Sopranos and your write-ups.
    Great effort Ron and I’ve read through 85 of the episode analyses just in time for the final one…as Patsy Parisi says: ‘Thank you. That was great’

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thanks Malignant Cunt. It’s crazy how many emails I get from SEO hucksters…they have no idea how low “Number of Clicks” is on my list of priorities for this website..


  21. There is a theory out there that stems from this episode. After the New York crew is discussing decapitating the New Jersey crew they are in the Flatbush beauty salon, the next scene Paulie is passing out barber scissors. As you mentioned 1. Paulie did not like taking orders from Bobbie, 2. In the beauty parlor scene someone asks if Paulie was on the hit list, and Butch says no. 3. In season 4 Paulie was talking to Johnny Sack about switching sides to New York. Do you think it is plauible that Paulie was feeding information to the New York Crew, and was in on the hit of Bobby, the attempted hit of Sylvio, and the arguable hit of Tony in the next episode?

    Liked by 2 people

    • I’ve heard this theory. Some people also say that because Bobby’s father was a barber, the scissors strengthen the link between Paulie and Bobby’s murder. I guess it’s a plausible theory, but I don’t know…


    • I never gave that theory any serious consideration. One thing that I’ve never heard disputed is that Tony Sirico agreed to the role on the condition that he would never be a rat. Plus, Minn Matrone’s husband was a barber accessories salesman. I also assumed Paulie helped himself to some scissors he found while rummaging around for the the money after he killed Minn.

      Liked by 1 person

  22. On Aug. 19, 1939, the Blue Comet wrecked at milepost 86

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Finally have the chance to put my own thoughts down on the first half of the series finale for the Sopranos. Just been busy with my new job and other things that prevented me from doing so earlier.

    Going back through both episodes each time, it’s incredible to notice how much is going on and really how many details, character stuff, ambiguous contexts and weaves and threads Chase and his team are packing into their last two episodes.

    With the first scene kicking things off with Silvo taking care of Burt Gervasi, cousin of Carlo. Which considering what happens to him in the next episode and the two Jasons as a whole. Makes you wonder was this another thing that may have influenced Carlo on any level, did the fact his cousin was caught trying to get in bed with NY and killed raise suspicions in him that Tony might single him out as well at somepoint? Did it put more fuel on the fire when Tony ripped into him back in Chasin It? I’m sure you will give us thoughts on it Ron in the next review.

    Then we have Uncle Philly and his scrapbooks scene, truly another wonderful scene for Frank Vincent to nail The Shah of Iran and truly show that there’s no more playing more, the roses and grandkids is dead for sure now. I said back in Kasha that something about Butchie just makes me suspect him for what he does in these two episodes, what he may or may not have been playing at? While again the theory i have heard is that the supposed FBI informant in Phil’s rank is Albert, which would make sense since he’s been seen all season with Phil while Butchie only turned up for the first time in Kaisha. And he’s vocal in raising not quite opposition, but surprise that Phil is really going through with taking out the supposed glorified crew. I wonder if Chase originally intended something else with Butchie for the last nine episodes, of him being the final threat for Tony but backpedaled and went with Phil because he suited his plans more and because Phil had more backstory, presence and beef with Tony. Not to mention Frank Vincent playing the role to perfection. And butchies aggression is a remnant of that aborted arc or was just bait and switch. Looking forward to seeing your thoughts on the next part on Butchie and what NY may be up to with everything in that episode.

    Next there’s Agent Harris, now with the fact we know the gun charge and Rico Case against Tony is going on in the background throughout this season. And the terrorist thing with the two Arabs that Harris was chasing that Tony uses to his advantage here, along with how he mentioned Phil tried to set up a female agent to be raped. It certainly leaves a lot of details and motivations for Harris to involve himself with all of this and what his final words in the next episode refer to in universe is one of the main things i always find interesting in the finale of the Sopranos. We know Harris has always been more… professional to tony than the rest of the Feds we have seen. But here he chooses to cross a thin line and i still wonder on if it was a mix of the things mentioned or maybe more to it than we are shown.

    Melfi… I’m still very mixed on what Chase decided to do with closing out the therapy stuff between her and Tony. On one hand, the whole Elliot pushing her to consider Tony a sociopath has been ongoing for a while and was seeded i think in season 3 and you could say season one with Mefi’s ex-husband thinking the same thing. Along with end of season five showed Melfi felt she was going round in circles with Tony everytime major things happen. So, the work is clearly there and it isn’t ooc for it to come up again. Though i think the way Chase handles Melfi reading Yochelson and Samenow is as you say very heavy handed and i wonder if maybe… maybe Chase is letting out the frustration he had with fans who rooted for Tony throughout the run of the series and which some fans think may have influenced some of his decision in regard to the finale itself.

    Lorranie and James’s final scene is truly well done and the two give it their all in bringing out all the frustration, all the tension between their two characters and how Melfi, feeling once again Tony was just repeating the same feelings, same choice of words (put his shoe up AJ’s arse) that he really doesn’t give a shit and has no desire to improve on himself (all of which truy by this point in the series). His actions with the magazine and how Tony accidentally digs at her uneasy feelings of treating him for all those years. all as you say likely played the part of her finally deciding to end her treatment of him.

    It is very abrupt and on my first watch felt like Chase rushed to close off that arc before everything else because overall Melfi’s arc ended in season 3 and she was kind of just there in the last few seasons. Along with that i felt the show leaving the impression for all that exploration of Tony, all the exploration of the psychological condition of the human science and other stuff. Its conclusion seem to be yeah Tony’s likely a sociopath. Which i do not believe he is for all his flaws, all his vices and screwed up beliefs and mental states. that and the fact sociopath gets thrown around in fiction and many viewers/readers on characters without any real understanding of what a sociopath actually is and how very few in rl are one.

    But rewatch’s now lead me to the same conclusions you do and that like someone mentioned in the last episode review, this was chases way of meta trying to steer us away from Tony’s head. Of closing him off from the audience for good.

    Elliot certainly reaches the height of his dickness in this episode with the way he gives way Melfi treating Tony and breaking confidentiality. What a prick and Peter Bogdanovich played him spot on through the series.

    Love Artie and Charmaine’s cameo here, you can tell how happy they are they can finally load over Tony and Carmella after all those years of those two shitting on them, using them and rubbing their marriage, status in their faces. They are one of the few soprano characters who get somewhat of a happy ending, marriage back together business seems to be fine and if you want to believe one theory of the finale. Finally relieved of Lead Belly for good.

    Now for the whacking stuff, as someone mentioned above, we get Butchie commenting on the redundant upper management of the DiMeo crew. And yet this episode, shows that claim isn’t without merit with the long line of command and tangling of arranging the hit, carrying it out and clear breakdown of communication between everyone in it that leads to the fuck up of hitting Phil’s goomah and her father and what comes after, compared to the NY hitman who are clearly given targets, locations and clear commands on who to take out and why and Phil going into hiding right away instead of dozing around as Tony and his upper management seem to do here (Paulie mentions Silov had his phone off all night). Now that is somewhat mob standard to insulate upper bosses from being charged with murder etc.

    But i suspect Chase wanted us to see how complacent in a way Tony and his crew have gotten, how much it has declined with so many of its member dying or going to jail during season six. Of how after so many false alerts and tension’s from earlier seasons they have allowed themselves to think that nothing is going to really happen. And thinking that they expect Phil to be with his goomah like last time. That when this time things don’t go as planned, that even when Tony gives the order, Silvo is messing around with paperwork at the Bing instead of getting the fuck out of there, Bobby going to a Train store in NY and leaving his phone in the car. Is it any wonder NY were able to kill Bobby and leave Silvo braindead and possibly speaking Norwegian now.

    bobby’s hit is the best in the serie, I love how they use the tracks, the train sets, Bobby’s hobby and final words to capture a man who we were first introduced as being seen nothing more than another fat dim witted seeming looking man. Who has grown and raised up the ranks through a mix of marrying Janice, taking care of Junior and being a good earner and dependable (seems Trains lead Bobby to lose focus as was the case in the first episode of season six). The shots of the little models, the railing off of the train. Truly sport on and wonderful work from the camera crew, set guys and Director.

    Along with that Paulie, as usual took full blame and responsibility, but that he didn’t do nothing (classic Paulie) and Patsi seem to be having his own mind elsewhere, no doubt with whatever is going on with his Jason, hence why in the finale he’s so quick to pull him away from Carlo’s Jason and his face etc. and why he takes so long to react to the hitman who come at him and Silvo. And whatever chips may fall with his other son with Meadow and his botched oversight of the hit.

    Oh Janice, here, as much as she’s clearly hobbing Junior onto Tony. Along with that we see in the next scene Bobby about to spend £8,000 dollars on a train set. It’s still truly disgusting how Tony reacts to it by offering her a dollar and quoting Exile on Main Street. Something i imagine he regrets when he finally sees his uncle for the last time.

    Finally, for AJ, once again he has a lot going for him in this episode. Meeting up with someone he knows, looking at the army again. Pulled out of Mountainside possibly because Tony is starting to feel the strain of his recent gambling episodes and spending sprees. Or likely he really believes Aj just need a shoe up his ass and influences him pulling him down to the ground when trying to get him out of the house. Which is… yeah what it is, even if Tony thought it was the only way to get Aj to get out of the house. He still could have done it another way in my view and was just looking to vent all his frustrations built up form what happened in the episode. Even if you don’t believe AJ is still depressed (which is a big danger for anyone who is suicidal as they can linger on and that is personal experience here). But really if Tony did not want to deal with his son, he should have left him to be at Mountainside where he could get the help he clearly needs.

    Final scene really is one of the creepiest with the way the house is, Silvo’s cardboard cutout nicely filling the background. The darkest and eerily silent of Tony clinging to his rifle, wondering if he will hear when it possibly happens (bobby certainly didn’t). Leaving viewers wondering of what is coming Tony and his crew’s way in the finale.

    It’s been quite the year that’s for sure. the pandemic is and will likely will the biggest world wide event we ever will experience. I like to think this year has given us positives to go with negatives, has made people stop to think of how lucky we haven’t had something like this happen in our lifetimes until now, of how we need to change in a number of ways. That we need to be better, to stay connected and so on and on. Let us never forget 2020, learn from it and do better.

    Anyways, i have rambled on long enough.

    Thanks again for your hard work Ron as always, it was well worth the wait and i know the wait for your final review, for the finale will be well worth it.

    No Pressure ;).


    Liked by 2 people

    • LOL “speaking Norwegian now.”

      Thanks B. I’m hoping to touch upon some of the points you mentioned in the final write-up, but at the same time I have to keep an eye on word-count and readability…

      Liked by 1 person

      • Cheers mate, oh i bet, i don’t envy you for the task of keeping the finale review to readable length, engaging in the many nunances of it and covering as much as you can without rambling on or making it so long. It might be an idea to do the review of the finale and then do a seperate conclusion piece of the sopranos denouncing your final thoughts or something. Like an epilogue of sorts covering what you want to cover but couldn’t in the episodes reviews etc.
        Or a theories page of your thought on the ambiguous points of the series, characters etc. Since the Sopranos is rich in both.

        Liked by 1 person

  24. Great job on these, Ron. I’ve read a number of them now piecemeal style and will probably get to them all eventually. You are diving deep, sir, and your conclusions are often quite convincing (a little more rigorous and a little less speculative than a lot of online Sopranos theorizing). I was a little surprised you went with Mario Vargas Llosa as your go-to for “spectacle.” I know he’s a Nobel laureate for literature and has a title called La civilización del espectáculo but I always thought of him more as primarily a novelist. When I hear “spectacle” I tend to think of the big “high theory” French guys like Debord & Guattari, Foucault, and Baudrillard. I’m sure Mario draws on them for his text on spectacle.

    If you’re not familiar with him, a contemporary philosopher that does great work analyzing present-day society is Byung-Chul Han. His theories about how we live in a “fatigue society” are quite convincing. I’ll just thrown one highbrow quote in here because you made me think of it when you spoke about how The Sopranos became popular in the early days of full-lockdown pandemic quarantines. People need to be bored. To not be assaulted and deluged. Those of us who use the internet (rather than letting it use and manipulate us) love coming to sites like yours because they are dedicated to long and sustained reads, not soundbite culture or flame wars. Thanks for taking the time to write about a serious work of art like an adult and a (non-stuffy) scholar.

    “We owe the cultural achievements of humanity–which include philosophy–to deep, contemplative attention. Culture presumes an environment in which deep attention is possible. Increasingly, such immersive reflection is being displaced by an entirely different form of attention: hyperattention. A rash change of focus between different tasks, sources of information, and processes characterizes this scattered mode of awareness. Since it also has a low tolerance for boredom, it does not admit the profound idleness that benefits the creative process.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • I appreciate that, Sean. If I’m not mistaken, Llosa borrowed the title “Civilization of the Spectacle” from another writer, but I can’t remember who. I don’t think it was one of the French post-modernists though; Llosa found many thinkers of that generation to be quite brilliant but believed they had a propensity, in his words, for “intellectual showiness”—which is itself a kind of spectacle…

      I’ll look up Byung-Chul Han, he sounds interesting..


      • Another amazing write-up Ron, thanks. I loved your insight about spectacle; though I admittedly know nothing about any of these philosophers. I did immediately think of Tony’s quote about distractions when you brought up spectacle: “It’s all a series of distractions until you die.” I think this also connects to the theme of the fucking regularness of life in the show. In the 21st century we’re looking for our arc, but in today’s society we don’t (or can’t) actively search for meaning in our lives, so we just sit back and consume. And to quote Bill Bryson, “joyous consumerism is a world of diminishing returns.” We distract ourselves with these spectacles (the internet, television, movies, etc.) without ever partaking in life it seems. Maybe creation is the opposite of consumption, and something that creates more real, longer-lasting joy. Creation of art (like these analyses) or creation of bonds with others may be the key to happiness that is lacking in the Sopranos’ world.

        Liked by 2 people

  25. I always thought the botched hit was an allegory of the war in Iraq and all the layers of subcontractors the US employed in what was another botched operation that led to the deaths of innocent civilians. 9/11 and the wars of the 2000s seem to loom very heavily over these final seasons in any case.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. “There was much head-scratching, even outrage, at the *manner* in which Melfi dumped [Tony Soprano]. Many fans felt the same way.”
    Looking at it with a more distant eye, one might even think it is something rare in ‘The Sopranos’, a scene which is not very well judged and not very well-written.
    At the beginning, Tony is speaking with apparent gentleness and compassion, confirming what Melfi read in the report. He speaks of his gratitude to the staff looking after A.J. at the clinic and says, “Bless them.” That was out of key – Tony would never have said it.
    He speaks of A.J.’s troubles and says, “We’ve talked about this.” Melfi sarcastically mutters, “And talked about it.” Again, I felt that was out of key.
    When she says, “It’s not the first time you’ve defaced my reading materials,” I laughed. What is she talking about – a Philip Roth first edition or a gaudy magazine sent free to wealthy shoppers? It’s a funny line, but I don’t believe she would have said it.
    We thought Melfi was a psychiatrist with qualms, a self-questioning psychiatrist, as well as being an emotional woman; but her emotions are shown too strongly in this scene, and I am not convinced.
    – – – – –
    Commenting on another episode, I wrote that I admire – a better word would be ‘respect’ – actresses who let themselves look ugly for the sake of their parts. Lorraine Bracco lets herself look ugly in this scene and I respect her for it.
    – – – – –
    When Tony tears the page out of the magazine, it reminds me of another scene, years earlier, in ‘College’. He is using a public phone, to which a phone directory is attached. In the directory he finds an advertisement giving both the phone number and the address of the person he is looking for. Instead of making a note with pen and paper, as you or I would do, he tears out the page. I would have liked to say to him, as Dr Melfi says now, “Did you give any thought to someone else who might want to read it?”
    – – – – –
    The commenter who saw that the names Arthur/Antony and Charmaine/Carmela echo each other was perceptive. The scene in the restaurant is very well done. The Bucco’s manner is full of congratulations and friendly interest, but they know that Tony and Carmela are not pleased with their daughter’s engagement or her decision to cease studying medicine, and they are ashamed of their son’s emotional disorder. They are needling the Sopranos, and they know it.
    – – – – –
    Thank you, Ron, for explaining certain things, such as ‘Man-genius’, which I’m sure that many of us didn’t get.

    Liked by 2 people

    • manny44ameritechnet

      I disagree that the scene is badly written or that Melfi’s rejection of Tony’s therapy is too abrupt. The awkwardness and emotionality she shows can be explained by how afraid and angry she is. Melfi is just far too emotionally invested and the therapy should have ended years ago. She knows that and is embarrassed and angry at herself for failing to “cure” him and angry at Tony for the manipulation. I personally totally believe Tony could say ” God Bless ’em” and that Melfi would say “It’s not the first time you’ve defaced my reading materials,” both lines are hilarious of course. Charmaine was ABSOLUTELY twisting the dagger into Carmela at Vesuvio’s and frankly, good for her. That scene is so uncomfortable to watch. Chase has the Bucco’s standing above the sitting Soprano’s for extra emphasis. Artie making the pen writing gesture to signify constitutional law is * Chef’s kiss* 😘

      Liked by 1 person

      • I agree. But Artie has no malice in him really. Charmaine is a different story.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Also, Tony used the therapy more as a sounding board on how to maneuver issues in his daily life. He totally was not interested in finding out about his reasons for the things he does. He said many times that what is the point of looking back at all these things? Is it good to see why we feel the way we do? Yes, but ultimately if you aren’t going to change our actions who cares really? They are what they are and there are more immediate things going on that he needs help with. He doesn’t want to change, or feels that he can anyway. He IS a sociopath…he feels bad for a while and then he doesn’t. She invested herself in him and let the therapy go on too long. She should have told him about the guy who raped her, and then cut him loose after he meted out justice. I think she had affection for him. She wasn’t ready to let him go. She’s human, and she liked him.

        Liked by 2 people

    • fuck that. tony was paying good money for her services. her emotions, or what he did with her advice, had no bearing.


      • Therapists let you go if they see they aren’t helping you or you are refusing to change. That happened to my Uncle. He was i therapy for years and finally the Dr. said that he didn’t think he was willing to be helped. It was a waste of money. Melfi was actually enabling him, not helping him. Not on purpose, but out of wanting to help him and because she had an affection for him. I don’t know how good of a therapist she was anyway. She did the right thing. He really needed behavioral therapy. Just my opinion.

        Liked by 1 person

  27. I still haven’t heard an opinion on Paulie bringing Barber Scissors to the Bing..could it be they are Min’s husbands??? That would be an interesting detail to throw in, not only killing her, but taking the “Precision Instruments” as well. In for a penny in for a pound!

    Liked by 2 people

  28. Great analysis as always, Ron. I’ve been thinking about the title. I think it reflects a major theme of the show going back to the first episode: Tony’s anxiety that his way of life (“this thing of ours” and America’s) is experiencing its death knell and his blame of contemporary culture for its decline. Where Tony lamented, “What ever happened to Gary Cooper?,” Bobby’s last words reflect a more mature take on the same subject: Bobby: “If [the Blue Comet] still ran New York to AC, Atlantic City would be a much different place today.” Owner: “Better class of people.” Bobby: “I suppose. Who the fuck really knows? Still, it’s nice to think that.”
    Bobby’s ambivalence shows an adult’s grasp of subtlety: maybe the idyllic past wasn’t actually all that idyllic–at least for everybody. Compare this to Tony’s simplistic, almost childlike, insistence that the past is better than the present. Bobby’s heartbreaking final exchange cements the point that this way of life is indeed over, given that the next generation has little interest in maintaining it: Owner–“Your son’ll like this too. Looks fast.” Bobby–“He don’t care.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • manny44ameritechnet

      That’s the aspect of Bobby I always liked. He was a slightly better adjusted human being than Tony or Paulie or Chris. I think a little too much was made of his supposed “innocence” as a character. He was never that. My favorite line reading of his was when he and Tony were in a diner and Bobby orders a steak and fries. Tony asks how it is because he’s bored by his egg whites and tomato slices.” It’s alright” Bobby says.😂😂 The way he says it, it’s like he’s saying “It’s a roadside diner steak, it’s mediocre what do you expect?” He really should have been more vigilant that day. Sloppy.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, and Chase has more to say on the death–or at least the deterioration–of the American Dream in the next episode…


  29. – :I do think that Tony has used therapy, mostly unconsciously, to improve upon his sense of self. This may contribute to his criminality, his pathology, a lot of things in his life too, even self-reflection. Janice does it too. For all her fakeness, Janice has traveled more than anyone else in Tony’s immediate family. She’s had humble, shitty jobs, fucked people above and below her age group (“Just eat your eggs, baby”), and I would argue listens to Pharaoh Sanders’ more out-there music unironically (I mean, who’s she performing to in that gas guzzler in S2? Herself? Possible, but…). For all that knowledge, is she any wiser than her brother? Janice has made her worldliness (such as it is) suit her own needs, as Tony has with therapy. We see how easily Janice wraps her own therapist around her finger IN ONE SCENE. And still, and still, I feel for her when she shakes her head at Bobby’s death and helplessly looks at her brother. “Oh my God. Oh MY GOD.”
    – :”Die as Yourself” is a trope in which someone who has either compromised their identity or had it compromised for them reverts to who they really are just before they die. Over the course of 6B we see Bobby harden a bit. He kills a man, usurps Chrissie’s position, and calls for war. But who do we see in his final scene? A man who loves model trains. In death, however, he’s a giant beast collapsing in on Newark, as the image above shows us.
    – :Roe’s final scene (I think she’s nonspeaking at Bobby’s funeral) is subtly interesting. In another life, this could’ve been her. Would Jackie’s leadership have landed the Di Meo Famiglia in this mess? Prob not, but we only ever saw Jackie the way Tony’s suboridnates see Tony, without all the internal conflict and complexity.
    – :Coco got some nice fake teeth, but his speech is slightly altered. Every little detail. This show is so good.
    – :New Jersey is hardly full of spring chickens, but New York upper mgmt is so old and unglamourous. Phil’s the only one who bothers to consistently dress sharply. They look like the Greeks in the Wire or Calogero Vizzini.

    Liked by 3 people

  30. I deliberately stayed away from this site for a few months just so I could binge your last couple reviews. I’m feeling very bittersweet about it of course but then I think, I’ll just have to do another full season or two rewatch and re-read of your work Ron. Anyways, I fucking love The Sopranos and SopranosAutopsy as well. It has enriched the show for me so much more.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Wow! After losing his staunch supporter Bobby, his long time confidante and oasis in his week, Melfi,
    and having his right hand man Silvio reduced to a cardboard cutout (AJ would correct me with – “Standee!!!”),
    it’s difficult to see how Tony recovers from this.
    Corky’s “…couldn’t be helped apparently” took part in Chase’s back grounding of the U.S. occupation of Iraq. That
    massive toll of collateral damage was mirrored by the collateral damage in this episode; from the Ukrainian debacle,
    to the motorcyclist in front of the Bing, to the traumatized customers at Bobby’s hobby shop, to AJ’s interrupted
    treatment. “Families don’t get touched, you know that…”, but Tony’s gotta know by now this just isn’t so.
    That final scene of Soprano on his back, cradling his assault rifle in a bleak upstairs bedroom while a tinkling
    piano ushers us out still drips with dread after multiple viewings. Wow!

    Liked by 3 people

  32. Scottie Walnuts

    As fate would have it… I finish my Autopsy-accompanied re-watch with this as the final writeup
    Can’t wait for what you have to say about Made in America
    And what a fitting theme of “spectacle” given the events that just transpired earlier this week, as most of us express outrage while our feet are up watching the TV cover the events like it was sport. We now know, 48 hours later approx. that at least five people died as a result of the events this week. CNN, on Wednesday, played the full (though grainy) video of the woman who was shot and killed in The Capitol, ostensibly to “show the full horror” of what transpired. There might be something to that, but I cannot help but feel like it was not a coincidence that the universe aligned with me to read this Autopsy now, with the “spectacle” of this week’s events fresh in mind. And of course, as many previous commenters have pointed out, to get to the final episode of this read-along-watch-through with nothing but blank to read…
    ‘Til we meet again in the Made in America write-up,
    Thanks for everything Ron,
    Scottie Walnuts

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Scottie Walnuts

    Addendum comment: is it possible The Sopranos is even more relevant today than it was when it aired? The arguments for would be extensive – far too much to go into here. But, it’s directly in line with what you wrote about the resurgence in popularity and memes that bring the characters alive into modern day. Call me dramatic, and I am a bit Walnuts, but The Sopranos, far from a “mere” mob drama, or cultural commentary, is a revelation of the spirit of modern Western man (American to be specific, but as a Canadian I (unfortunately?) have far more in common with the American experience than with the European experience, which Sopranos contrasts with America/New Jersey).
    Anywho – Walnuts out, though I might do some poking around and commenting on previous episodes as these thoughts come to mind

    Liked by 2 people

  34. Might Paulie’s collection of white shoes symbolize the bunch of ghouls following him around?

    Liked by 2 people

    • I think Paulie’s collection of white shoes symbolizes both his status a “sole” survivor of the series, and the fact that he is an old man, who wore the same kind of shoes as Burt Gervasi. Paulie always had 9 lives, so his extensive shoe collection reflects that he always finds a way out, or escapes a terrible fate somehow. He is, in my opinion, the only character who believes sincerely in a higher power, and makes no apologies for who he is. He accepts himself, and makes no effort to change even when, as in “Remember When”, it is pointed out to him that he talks too much and makes a bit of a spectacle out of himself. He survives because he understands his true nature and accepts it–unlike everyone else in the show, who are all trying to put on a show (duality) for the public.

      Liked by 1 person

  35. Great write up as always, recently finished a rewatch and this has been bookmarked for each episode. In any case, I find it funny that Melfi was so reviled for her (seemingly arbitrary) reasoning to stop treating Tony. This is a character who threw a table at her, made her see clients at a motel, more than once made her feel afraid, walked out in the middle of appointments, and admitted romantic/sexual feelings for her. The ethics of what Melfi’s decision to end things should certainly be discussed, but also worthy of discussion is if Melfi was 5 seasons too late in cutting him off.

    Liked by 2 people

    • One of the great things about The Sopranos is the passion it stirs in the viewers. Some people love characters that others despise. For those who rewatch the series, attitudes evolve and even reverse themselves concerning some characters. Melfi isn’t any different. Some people think that she shouldn’t have been such a large part of the show, or should have been shown the door earlier in the series. Whether or not I like the character, I think her place was an important one. She wasn’t family, which I think was a huge point. She was in a position where she could be objective, yet she chose to form a relationship and to care. In a way I think she represents a position that we all have occupied at one time or another.
      What do you do with a toxic person in your life? One that throws tables, becomes a barrier to other relationships, frightens us, ignores us, etc. At what point do we cut them off? And not just an extreme example as Tony, but what about a boss who’s a jerk? When do you quit? That work associate who always leaves the coffee pot empty? We wonder why Melfi put up with it at all? Why do we put up with people who drag us down? Because we think we can help them? Once we decide to stick with a seemingly bad relationship, who long is acceptable before we realize the futility of our decision and decide to cut our losses, admit we were wrong, and separate from them, bracing ourselves for the gleeful “I-told-you-so” comments from the Elliotts and Richards in our lives?

      Liked by 2 people

      • It’s an interesting question, particularly now, when so many families and friendships have become seriously divided… Should we make a clean break with someone whose viewpoint/values/lifestyle we find toxic, or do we try to salvage the relationship by focusing on common ground?

        Liked by 1 person

  36. Ron, I wanted to drop you a note and thank you for this site. I’ve enjoyed these write-ups and your perspective on this great show. It’s fun to view the same scenes differently on each re-watch, based on ideas discussed here. Some I hop on board, some I don’t–but it’s fun nonetheless. Good luck with your future projects and stay well!

    Liked by 2 people

  37. I’m not sure I agree with the redundant management comment being reflected by the passing down of the Phil hit to multiple people. I always thought it was a direct reference to the “official” structuring of the family; with Junior and Tony both being bosses (bleeding off half the kick).

    I think it is more indicative of Paulie’s fear of going after Phil.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Can you please do a write up on episode 21. your analysis is very much needed!

    Liked by 1 person

  39. Awesome write-up as always!

    I must be dense, but could someone please explain the “Leadbelly” reference to me? It’s going over my head.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks. Lead Belly was an old-timey singer (which may evoke thoughts of the operatic name “Soprano”), but more directly, Uncle Junior had earlier put a slug of lead in Tony’s belly.

      Liked by 1 person

  40. Ron, what’s up with the scene when Butchie and the NY guys were planning the hit in that salon and then he rearranges the bottles or something. Is there something more into that scene or just a signature Sopranos “regularness of life” moment?

    Liked by 1 person

    • manny44ameritechnet

      Visually, I always thought the shot of Butchie cleaning up a salon station was a funny and interesting shot but I wonder if it isn’t also meant to tie Paulie , and his showing up to Satriale’s with a shipment of barber scissors, with the New York crew yet again.

      Liked by 1 person

    • I figure its a ‘regularness of life’ moment. Just like New Jersey has Silvio who’s constantly fixing stuff, maybe New York has Butchie who’s constantly rearranging things…

      Liked by 1 person

  41. My thought is that Tony goes to jail, and the rest of the crew that is left either goes over to New York, or they keep business up as long as possible. We see Mink telling Tony that the RICO case has come to fruition and that people are talking. I am positive he will go to jail. I think his power has been diminished, and Paulie is unenthusiastic, so he would be the first one to go with New York, since he tried multiple times.. I think its the end of the Soprano crew. Could he get killed, yes, but I don’t see the point. Maybe Chases reference to a death scene was the Death of the Soprano Organized Crime family.

    Liked by 2 people

  42. Thanks for the great blog which I have really enjoyed. Maybe I am over-thinking this but when Carmela and Tony are in the elevator in Mountainside, Tony presses the button for floor six then Carmela says “Just one more week of this”. Could this be a double meaning – where floor six = season six, with one more episode left?

    Liked by 2 people

    • That’s an interesting thought..

      Liked by 1 person

    • That’s a reach

      Liked by 1 person

      • Orangeannie, I will miss your commentary and everyone else’s after Ron delivers his final
        autopsy. Moltisanti’s “You learn as much from others” truly applies to this comments section
        of ours.
        I get the face value reading of “That’s a reach”, but a second reading makes me wonder if you
        aren’t slyly endorsing Jones’s hypothesis by referencing the final episode with a paraphrase of
        Agent Harris’ initial response to Tony – “You’re overreaching”.
        Yeah? No?
        Anyway, ding! The elevator ride ends, and soon the last supper will begin.

        Liked by 1 person

  43. The amount of research into this series that you have done is worth examining by a national journal. Have you written a professional study or a book on this series?
    Another point to make: You have marvelously written about this series, spanning many years. Do you look back on early analyses of episodes and made efforts to update your thoughts?
    Best regards to you and your father who, as I understand, died in recent events.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thanks Cory. I’m not very happy with some of my earlier write-ups, but I don’t generally go back to update or improve them..


      • Sometimes that’s better, Ron. Instead of fixing it, you see how you’ve changed/improved over time. Don’t look at those early write-ups as negatives; look at your more recent work as improvement and development in what you’re passionate about. You might find more value in the journey than a polished version of the past.

        Liked by 1 person

  44. Did you ever realize that SOPRANOS is RON’S SOAP … ?
    Cheers from Paris France.
    Your is très sophistiqué !

    Liked by 1 person

  45. I meant ‘Your work’ …

    Liked by 1 person

  46. François Truffaut once said that everybody has two jobs: their own job and film critic. I don’t know what your own job is, but your work as a critic throws Pauline Kael into oblivion. Your are nonpareil. Mille mercis.

    Liked by 1 person

  47. Just a quick thing here, Ron. I rewatched this one again recently and I’d never made the connection before, but the comically oversized gun in the trash bag that Tony totes into the safe house is certainly phallocentric as well. Especially the way Tony clings to it. He’s surrounded by goombah men of various ages, all equally tremulous yet trying to project machismo and confidence. Tony looks legit scared and exposed on that bed, the type of soldier who’s used to the rear lines (like, say, a general, to allude to a certain painting) finally about to see actual combat. The size of the gun also brought to mind the last few episodes of Breaking Bad, where an aging-poorly white male antihero who doesn’t qualify as traditionally handsome (bald in Walt’s case, obese in Tony’s) has also equipped himself with an absolutely humongous weapon that certainly brings my mind to the word “Freudian.”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sometimes a gun is just a gun, but there may certainly be some Freudian stuff going on here. Tony might very well be feeling less powerful at this moment in time, and he overcompensates for it with a giant weapon. I’ll be getting more into Tony’s powerlessness/impotence in the next write-up…


    • I wonder if Tony had his recurring Coach Molinari dream that night in the upper room.
      “What’s that you got there? A bigger dingus than the one God gave you?”

      Liked by 3 people

  48. I love how they used Tindersticks in the penultimate episodes of both Season 1 and Season 6. They’ve been a dearly beloved band of mine since 2001, when I was a wee pretentious little seventeen year old thing. Hearing “Running Wild” close that episode out hit me hard, because that album in particular is very very dear to my heart. In addition to that song and “Tiny Tears”, I also strongly recommend “My Oblivion”, “Can We Start Again?”, “If She’s Torn”, “Sweet Memory”, and that duet they did with Isabella Rosellini that’s title escapes me. “Marriage Made In Heaven”, maybe? I also think you’d love the video for Can We Start Again, Ron.
    Melfi… you were such a f***ing amazing character. Whenever the wind whistles through the trees, I’ll think “Lowenstein, Lowenstein…”
    Over the past month I’ve finally watched the show properly, through and through, by myself, on my own terms, and making my own interpretations, rather than always just catching various episodes here and there when it was being watched by the men in my life… my brothers, my father, my roommates, my heroin friends, etc. And every single one of them was always primarily into it for the “hits and tits”, which really negatively coloured my perceptions of the show. I ended up thinking that stuff – which I have little taste for – was the main draw or point. But it absolutely isn’t.
    Watching it on my own terms, I can finally see how powerful and compelling and rich characters like Melfi, Carmela, Artie, and Svetlana are, and how good their stories.
    IMO? Melfi is tied with Svetlana for being by far the *strongest* character in the show. She’s not flawless by any means (that wouldn’t be interested), but she has reserves of strength and courage far in excess of most of the people populating the show’s universe. This is a woman, who in full knowledge of who Tony is and what he’s about and what he’s capable of, is willing to say “fuck you” right to his face. And the “No” in Employee Of The Month… being able to see that kind of female strength and moral strength in the context of the famously macho gangster genre is SOOOO beautifully subversive. It’s a genre wherein a character’s power is almost always displayed through violence, and said power is generally the exclusive domain of men. And here is a woman displaying her power through the decisive REFUSAL of violence, while existing in nominal relationship to that genre.
    IMO, this final episode for her echoes that strength and that refusal again, with one more, final, definitive “No”: she will NOT be party to the evil Tony does. She will no longer enable him. She will no longer accept his tainted money. She has finally, conclusively moved past all the things that were still tying her to him. Even as Carmela and, tragically, Meadow (as we see in the next episode) ultimately were UNABLE to pull themselves away from his terrible gravity.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Well said. It’s interesting…your favorite characters are Melfi and Svetlana because their strength subverts the genre, while one of my favorite characters is Chris because his Hamlet-like weakness subverts the genre…

      Liked by 1 person

      • That’s a really interesting observation! And Christopher, of course, subverts the genre in countless other ways too. More than any other character, he’s definitely the “here’s our show’s thoughts about gangster genre media” character.

        Liked by 1 person

  49. P.S.
    “We’re all professionals here” right after Elliot behaved in a RIDICULOUSLY unprofessional manner was an outright belly laugh for me. 😛

    Liked by 1 person

  50. Thanks Ron! Your thoughts really enriched the series!

    Liked by 1 person

  51. Something to add as I rewatched it:
    The scene with Janice flashes back to the first scene we see with her and Tony. They are taking by the pool and the drain is floating in the pool. The contrast between the full pool in season 1 with the pool being drained and the full colors of this episode further imply that the Sopranos are running out of time. Unsurprisingly Janice is asking for money in that scene as well. Michael Imperioli comments on his podcast that this scene with the drain is the first of many “snake” images we see associated with Janice and I think having this image reappear at the end reinforces her as a static character.
    Amazing write up, can’t wait for the last one!

    Liked by 2 people

  52. Svetlana is a fascinatingly feminist character, Natalie, I agree. I think part of the reason her scenes resonate so much is that the actress who plays her essentially won the equivalent of the Best Actress Oscar for Russian film. Gandolfini was an intimidating presence and serious thespian, but this is someone who was like, “I’m as good as you are, dude,” and her ability to underplay things matches/pairs with his his “big presence” and ferocity (which I was lucky enough to see in person on stage before he passed). She (Alla Kliouka, whose husband is also a pretty canonical figure in the Russian film world) takes a very limited/narrow role (one-legged Russian cousin to the lead’s mistress) and makes it one of the greatest supporting characters in TV history. No offense to Imperioli’s chops, Bracco’s perfect casting, or Bogdanovich’s encompassing wryness, but Alla’s acting game is next level.

    Liked by 1 person

  53. Love this

    Liked by 1 person

  54. Please "Bear" With Us

    Wrong episode I’m going to mention, but I’m looking forward to the big finale. It may be my favorite episode. A Rorschach blot of an ending.
    Privately, the day the new presidential administration was sworn in felt like that episode to me: after months of fear and expecting perhaps nothing less than the end of the country (stress a la Tony going to the mattresses), things turn suddenly back to normal. Then you realize that the old problems are still there and will never go away and you remember the total uncertainty of everyday life.
    Huh. Maybe this isn’t the wisest thing to post on a forum, don’t want to politicize. But it really felt that way to me on January 20th. I kept thinking I was AJ, suddenly full of life, depression lifted, and Tony, out in the relative open again. And then realizing it may not all work out in the end anyway, but hey, live while you’re alive. Or something.
    That cut to black summarizes my view of life, the universe, and everything. It is a stunt but also profound; a cop-out and incredibly ballsy; funny, sad, scary, tranquil, etc.
    Now if only we can integrate the series into the MCU in a graceful way… (okay that’s a joke; I’m out)

    Liked by 2 people

  55. Andy the English guy

    By turning Phil into a house that yells cocksucker, Chase deliberately exposes the tensions between the long established metaphysical perspectives on human existence, and more transcendental notions typical of Tibetan Buddhism and the writings of Kant now regaining currency as developments in quantum mechanics increasingly permeate the popular consciousness. It’s also cheaper.

    Liked by 1 person

  56. I think there’s a lot of focus on the impact on innocent people/society these mobsters’ actions have: the two people mistakenly shot dead; the screaming, most likely traumatised children (& other customers) in the train shop; and the motorcycle guy.

    Also the irony of Tony telling Carmela “family are off-limits” when his two hitmen who thought they were shooting Phil assumed they also shot his daughter, since she called him, “daddy”.

    I really enjoyed this write-up and can’t wait for the next one!

    Liked by 2 people

  57. On the comet, comets were also seen as a bad omen in Western culture. The Bayeux Tapestry makes reference to the witnessing of Haley’s Comet passing by earth in January 1066. It was seen by many at the time as an bad omen, and in the Tapestry, is interpreted as an omen for the Norman conquest of England.
    Perhaps the titular comet was an omen for NY’s attempted conquest of NJ? Or perhaps it’s just an omen for the “end times”?

    Liked by 2 people

  58. Hello Ron, love your site! How do you feel about the issues raised in this video:–MzKv0&ab_channel=WowLynchWow%21

    Liked by 1 person

    • Good video. But I think the question raised is answered in the phone call between Butchie and Phil in the final episode…they don’t really seem to have a whole lot of respect for one another.


  59. June the Tenth

    Liked by 2 people

  60. Please "Bear" With Us

    Ron, did you see what David Chase said today? He’s releasing an extended version of Made In America in which Valery the Russian emerges from the Holsten’s bathroom and he and Tony go at it in “an epic tribute to Tarantino, particularly Kill Bill” (Chase’s words). Tony also appears to know Kung Fu, which I think is a masterful twist that reinforces the Eastern themes in the last stretch of the show.
    Chase is quoted in the article as saying “It’s all about giving the audience what they want… they always know best.”
    I guess this changes your next write-up. Wanted to make sure you knew.
    (I am going to watch the whole series after your next write-up… your stuff should really be published somewhere, as it’s better than any book about Sopranos, including Sopranos Sessions.)

    Liked by 1 person

  61. The trailer for Newark is finally here.

    Interesting trailer, Livia’s actress almost feels like she’s channeling Carmella at times. Dickie’s first scene drinking alcohol and Tony having vibes of AJ as well. Uncle Jun with his hat. Can’t wait to see the film.

    Liked by 1 person

  62. Yeah!

    Liked by 1 person

  63. Trailers galore!

    Liked by 1 person

  64. I was (and still am) worried about casting Stoll as Corrado, Magaro as Silvio and Magnussen as Paulie and really hope I”m wrong (Chase knows!)
    but no problem with Farmiga as Livia. Spot on.

    Liked by 1 person

  65. The entire time I was under the impression that TMSON was going to be a Dickie Moltisanti story – but since the trailer was released, I have my doubts.
    * Trailer was focused on Tony
    * The by-line “A Sopranos Story” was added
    * The WB synopsis says it follows Tony through the riots
    Optimistically, I would like to chalk this up to studio interference in order to drum up hype. But I don’t really want to see a movie about the “Baby Sopranos”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Its really about Dickie Moltisanti. I think the hook in the trailer is Tony Soprano as a kid, and his son playing him.. He’s in it, but I think the film is really about the race riots in Newark, and how it affects the mob. I can’t wait to see it. I think the Livia Character should have tried to sound more like Nancy Marchand, like the other 2 actresses did in the flashbacks on the Sopranos. But I am looking forward to it. Don’t have high expectations and take it as it comes. It might be a stand alone movie with familiar characters.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hey, is it me or does this movie totally retcon Tony’s age? I get that we can’t expect total exactness with these things, but wasn’t T in his late thirties in the late 90s? That would put him being born in the late fifties or early sixties, and a lot younger than his seeming age in the movie. In fact wasn’t it established he was about ten during the riots? I got curious about this and saw a write up expressing similar thoughts.
        This will completely alter the series. First of all, it makes Tony friggin’ draftable for nam! Sociologically, that’s huge because the generation that came up after the draft and nam had a totally different reality by not being subject to the draft. This leads to the obvious question: why wasnt he drafted? He’d be the heart of the men who were drafted for that war: white, working class men in their late teens a d early 20s.
        Another thing: I hate the fact that they used a cover of a Dylan song that isn’t even from that era. Yes, I’m pedantic in this way, but I’m a huge music head and can’t stand anachronisms like that. Granted, this is a trailer and not part of a scene, but still….I crave authenticity and minute detail from my period pieces….
        Another thing: I don’t think Michael is good fit this role. James always carried that aura of menace, that combustible mix of lethality and gregarious charisma. His son just seems soft to me. To award him the role out of deference to bis dad tragically passing is laudable but lazy casting.
        I’m being harsh, I suppose, but a huge part of the show’s appeal to me was the generational decline of the ethnic American male. Tony was raised in Newark and had an innate respect and longing for a vanished sense of toughness. He was from the city not the burbs and mixed it up with minorities in a way that sissified white liberal, progressive chumps very rarely do. Yes, this is a loaded generalization, but a true one.
        Say what you will about stereotyping, but the working class Italian American male of the the first half of the last century was uncommonly tough, hard, Macho, brave, patriotic and violent. Look at Rocky Marciano. Poor, short, uneducated, seemingly a dullard, undersized, stubby armed, a World War Two vet, yet possessed of an endurance, patience, capacity for pain and a pure ruggedness that propelled him to victory after victory. Ever heard of a marine John Basilone? He is the literal embodiment of a courage that every marine prays he could muster. The list is endless.
        It was this sense of a vanishing identity that fueled the popularity of the working class Italian male in the seventies, from the ultimate throwback in the first Rocky to shows and movies like toma, baretta, happy days, travolta’s trinity of oversexed, underbrained Italian punks in welcome back kotter, grease and sat night fever. Italian men of bygone eras were hard, tough, and Tony knew and admired that, was raised by that, and wanted to BE that ….. But Tony was the last vestige of that stew and recognized that the spoils of his profession had spoiled his son. Being Italian meant nothing to AJ. Remember Tony waxing wistfully about the church his grandfather and great uncle built? It meant nothing to AJ…..
        So, anyway, enough rambling. I’ll give the movie a chance….just have some real misgivings….

        Liked by 2 people

    • I think the advertising is playing up Tony more due to the fact he was the star and main character of the series and that its James son playing him. Compared to Dickie who only got mentioned a few times in the series, never appeared in person or flashbacks and compared to Johnny and Junior Soprano, is shrouded in myth. Overall, i think the film is going to establish for the most part who Dickie was overall, how much of a role he really played in Tony’s life and how his relationship and influence on tony parallels Tony’s with Chris.

      I mean, Chase wouldn’t choose to return to the Sopranos universe, the time period without having a purpose, a story and theme he wants to do.

      The trailer’s first scene of him is drinking and hiding the bottle before Tony comes out, which didn’t surprise me. I always thought the camel didn’t fall far from the canopy’s nose. Chris certainly came to think his dad was nothing more than a junkie

      I thought Livia was acting and looking more like Carmella than Livia as well, i know the series many times over made clear Tony was always attracted to women who resembled or acted like his mum. But i felt this was a bit on the nose and doesn’t match up how i think Livia would look by the late 60’s, since when she had her miscarriage when Tony was sixteen, with the wiki having tony’s birth-date being 59 so this would have been 1975. But i chalk this up to possibly some rectons on tony’s age or the film most likely taking place over a decade or so like Goodfellas. But then the Sopranos was never strict on stuff like this.

      I think Juniors actor has the part nailed down, hoping he gets to be the Junior we all know and love, as much as Dominic made the character on all levels. I’m interested to see how Jon does as Johnny Soprano, he’s impressed me in every film and series i have seen him in.

      Looking forward to when it comes out this October and it doesn’t get delayed again.

      Liked by 1 person

  66. There’s been a lot of discussion about whether Made in America is a great final episode or not, but can we agree that The Blue Comet is the best penultimate episode of any last season of a TV show?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s